Blood glucose reduction by diabetic drugs with minimal hypoglycaemia risk for cardiovascular outcomes: Evidence from meta‐regression analysis of randomized controlled trials

Aims To investigate the effects of blood glucose control with antihyperglycaemic agents with minimal hypoglycaemia risk on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Materials and methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the relative efficacy and safety of antidiabe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiabetes, obesity & metabolism Vol. 20; no. 9; pp. 2131 - 2139
Main Authors Huang, Chi‐Jung, Wang, Wei‐Ting, Sung, Shih‐Hsien, Chen, Chen‐Huan, Lip, Gregory Y. H., Cheng, Hao‐Min, Chiang, Chern‐En
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2018
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aims To investigate the effects of blood glucose control with antihyperglycaemic agents with minimal hypoglycaemia risk on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Materials and methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the relative efficacy and safety of antidiabetic drugs with less hypoglycaemia risk were comprehensively researched in MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library up to January 27, 2018. Mixed‐effects meta‐regression analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) reduction and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular death, all‐cause death, and hospitalization for heart failure. Results Ten RCTs comprising 92 400 participants with T2D were included and provided information on 9773 MACE during a median follow‐up of 2.6 years. The mean HbA1c concentration was 0.42% lower (range, 0.27%‐0.86%) for participants given antihyperglycaemic agents than those given placebo. The meta‐regression analysis demonstrated that HbA1c reduction was significantly associated with a decreased risk of MACE (β value, −0.39 to −0.55; P < 0.02) even after adjusting for possible confounding factors including age, sex, baseline HbA1c, duration of follow‐up, difference in achieved systolic blood pressure, difference in achieved body weight, and risk difference in hypoglycaemia. Lowering HbA1c by 1% conferred a significant risk reduction of 30% (95% confidence interval, 17%‐40%) for MACE. By contrast, the meta‐regression analysis for trials using conventional agents failed to demonstrate a significant relationship between achieved HbA1c difference and MACE risk (P > 0.74). Conclusions Compared with placebo, newer T2D agents with less hypoglycaemic hazard significantly reduced the risk of MACE. The MACE reduction appears to be associated with HbA1c reduction in a linear relationship.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-3
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
1463-1326
DOI:10.1111/dom.13342