Redox-Induced Carbon-Carbon Bond Formation by Using Noninnocent Ligands

The control of radical reactions to afford selective carbon–carbon bond formation is a significant synthetic challenge with applications ranging from small‐molecule activation to natural product synthesis. Oxidation of (IP–)2Al(CH3) (1, IP = iminopyridine) with TrBPh4 (Tr = trityl) afforded the C–C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of inorganic chemistry Vol. 2013; no. 22-23; pp. 3831 - 3835
Main Authors Myers, Thomas W., Yee, Gereon M., Berben, Louise A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Weinheim WILEY-VCH Verlag 06.08.2013
WILEY‐VCH Verlag
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The control of radical reactions to afford selective carbon–carbon bond formation is a significant synthetic challenge with applications ranging from small‐molecule activation to natural product synthesis. Oxidation of (IP–)2Al(CH3) (1, IP = iminopyridine) with TrBPh4 (Tr = trityl) afforded the C–C coupled product [(IP)(Tr‐IP)Al(CH3)][BPh4] (2) in which the trityl radical and the IP– radical have undergone C–C bond formation. In contrast, oxidation of 1 with TrBArF24 {BArF24 = tetrakis[(3,5‐trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate} or TrB(C6F5)4 affords cationic [(IP)(IP–)Al(CH3)][BArF24] (3a) or [(IP)(IP–)Al(CH3)][B(C6F5)4] (3b), respectively . The different reaction outcomes provided by the different counteranions of Tr+ imply that a difference in stability of the products or of the intermediate mixed‐valent [(IP)(IP‐)Al(CH3)]+ state exists. We speculate that the most likely factor is the difference in solubility afforded by the different anions of the products that are formed. We also show that the formation of stable, cationic biradical complexes is possible and that these complexes do not undergo C–C radical coupling at the IP ligand. Cationic [(IP–)2Al(OEt2)][BArF24] (4) was obtained by protonolysis of 1 with H(OEt2)2BArF24, and two‐electron oxidation of [(IP2–)2Al]– (5) afforded [(IP–)2Al(thf)][BArF24] (6). Oxidation of (IP–)2Al(CH3) (IP = iminopyridine) with TrBPh4 (Tr = trityl) affords the C–C‐coupled kinetic product [(IP)(Tr‐IP)Al(CH3)][BPh4] in which the trityl radical and the IP– radical have undergone C–C bond formation. Oxidation of (IP–)2Al(CH3) with TrBArF24 affords the thermodynamic product [(IP)(IP–)Al(CH3)][BarF24] {BArF24 = tetrakis[(3,5‐trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate}.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-W8PPHK9G-S
ArticleID:EJIC201300192
istex:9CD4706006F5DA9D31D95E1A694476ED94424863
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1434-1948
1099-0682
DOI:10.1002/ejic.201300192