A coordinated preventive care approach for healthy ageing in five European cities: A mixed methods study of process evaluation components
Aims To evaluate specific process components of the Urban Health Centres Europe (UHCE) approach; a coordinated preventive care approach aimed at healthy ageing by decreasing falls, polypharmacy, loneliness and frailty among older persons in community settings of five cities in the United Kingdom, Gr...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of advanced nursing Vol. 75; no. 12; pp. 3689 - 3701 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.12.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Aims
To evaluate specific process components of the Urban Health Centres Europe (UHCE) approach; a coordinated preventive care approach aimed at healthy ageing by decreasing falls, polypharmacy, loneliness and frailty among older persons in community settings of five cities in the United Kingdom, Greece, Croatia, the Netherlands and Spain.
Design
Mixed methods evaluation of specific process components of the UHCE approach: reach of the target population, dose of the intervention actually delivered and received by participants and satisfaction and experience of main stakeholders involved in the approach.
Methods
The UHCE approach intervention consisted of a preventive assessment, shared decision‐making on a care plan and enrolment in one or more of four coordinated care‐pathways that targeted falls, polypharmacy, loneliness and frailty. Quantitative data from a questionnaire and quantitative/qualitative data from logbooks were collected among older persons involved in the approach. Qualitative data from focus groups were collected among older persons, informal caregivers and professionals involved in the approach. Quantitative data were analysed by means of descriptive statistics and multilevel logistic regression models. Qualitative data were analysed through thematic analysis.
Results
Having limited function was associated with non‐enrolment in falls and loneliness care‐pathways (both p < .01). The mean rating of the approach was 8.3/10 (SD 1.9). Feeling supported by a care professional and meeting people were main benefits for older persons. Mistrust towards unfamiliar care providers, lack of confidence to engage in care activities and health constraints were main barriers towards engagement in care.
Conclusions
Although the UHCE approach was received generally positively, health constraints and psychosocial barriers prevented older person's engagement in care.
Impact
Coordinated preventive care approaches for older community‐dwelling persons should address health constraints and psychosocial barriers that hinder older person's engagement in care. Trial registration: ISRCTN registry number is ISRCTN52788952. Date of registration is 13/03/2017.
目的
评估欧洲城市保健中心(UHCE)方法具体流程组成部分;采取致力于通过减少英国、希腊、克罗地亚、荷兰和西班牙五个城市的社区中老人跌倒、多重用药、孤独和脆弱的协调预防护理方法。
设计
对欧洲城市保健中心(UHCE)方法具体流程部分的评估:目标人群范围、实际提供和受试者接收到的干预剂量以及参与方法的主要利益相关者的满意度和体验。
方法
欧洲城市保健中心(UHCE)方法干预包括预防评估、共享护理计划决策以及以减少跌倒、多重用药、孤独和脆弱为目标的四种协调护理方式之一或其中多个。问卷调查中的定量数据以及日志中的定量或定性数据是从参与该方法的老年人中收集而来。焦点小组的定性数据是从参与该方法的老年人、非正式护理人员以及健康专家中收集而来。采用描述性统计和多层逻辑回归模型对定量数据进行分析。采用专题分析对定性数据进行分析。
结果
功能受限与跌倒和孤独感护理方法并未注册相关(两者均p<.01)。该方法的平均评分为8.3/10(标准差(SD)为1.9)。老年人主要受益在于得到专业人员的护理以及与人见面。不信任不熟悉的护理人员以及缺乏参与护理活动的信心和健康约束是参与护理的主要障碍。
结论
虽然欧洲城市保健中心(UHCE)方法普遍被积极接受,健康约束和心理障碍阻碍了老年人参与护理。
影响
针对社区老年人的协调预防护理方法应解决阻碍老年人参与护理的健康约束和心理障碍。
试验注册
ISRCTN注册号是ISRCTN52788952。注册日期为2017年3月13日。 |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding information This work was supported by the European Union, CHAFEA, third health programme, grant number 20131201. XZ is supported by a China Scholarship Council (CSC) PhD Fellowship for her PhD study in Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. The scholarship file number is 201706010358, CSC URL . http://www.csc.edu.cn/ ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0309-2402 1365-2648 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jan.14181 |