European perspective of perampanel response in people with Intellectual Disability
Background Epilepsy prevalence is over 20% for those with ID. It is difficult to diagnose and treat and more likely to be treatment resistant. The evidence informing prescribing is sparse, particularly for new drugs such as perampanel (PMP). Aims of the Study This study seeks to strengthen the resea...
Saved in:
Published in | Acta neurologica Scandinavica Vol. 142; no. 3; pp. 255 - 259 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Denmark
Hindawi Limited
01.09.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
Epilepsy prevalence is over 20% for those with ID. It is difficult to diagnose and treat and more likely to be treatment resistant. The evidence informing prescribing is sparse, particularly for new drugs such as perampanel (PMP).
Aims of the Study
This study seeks to strengthen the research evidence regarding PMP for people with ID by pooling information from two isolated and separately conducted studies: the UK‐based Epilepsy Database Register (Ep‐ID) and the data from the Kempenhaeghe clinic in the Netherlands.
Methods
A single data set of comparable data was created and analysed under agreement and supervision of a UK statistician.
Results
Seizure reduction within twelve months was evident in 62% of Dutch and 47% of UK patients. Retention rates were higher for those in the UK (P = .01) and for patients with moderate to profound ID, whilst side effects were more prominent in the Dutch cohort.
Conclusions
Comparable rates of seizure reduction are in line with estimates for non‐ID patients, adding to the evidence suggesting that PMP has a similar impact on those with ID. Taking a European perspective and sharing data across centres can help strengthen the evidence for prescribing antiepileptic drugs in the ID population. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding information Eisai UK provided an unconditional grant to support the start‐up cost of the Ep‐ID Register detailed in this paper. Eisai UK provided an Investigator Instigated unconditional grant to support the analysis of the pooled anonymous data extracted from two research databases (IIS‐CFT‐PER‐03). The research completed at the Kempenhaeghe clinic did not receive any specific grant from either public or commercial funding agencies. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0001-6314 1600-0404 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ane.13261 |