Establishing a state‐wide pelvic exenteration multidisciplinary team meeting in South Australia

• Published in: ANZ journal of surgery Vol. 93; no. 5; pp. 1227 - 1231
• Main Authors: Fitzsimmons, Tracy, Thomas, Michelle, Tonkin, Darren, Murphy, Elizabeth, Hollington, Paul, Solomon, Michael, Sammour, Tarik, Luck, Andrew
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Melbourne John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 01.05.2023; Blackwell Publishing Ltd
• Subjects: Carcinoma; Colorectal cancer; Colorectal carcinoma; Data collection; Health risks; Humans; Malignancy; multidisciplinary care; Multidisciplinary teams; Palliation; Patient Care Team; Patients; Pelvic Exenteration; Retrospective Studies; South Australia; Surgery; South Australia; pelvic exenteration; colorectal cancer; multidisciplinary care
• ISSN: 1445-1433; 1445-2197
• DOI: 10.1111/ans.18220

Background Pelvic exenteration surgery is complex, necessitating co‐ordinated multidisciplinary input and improved referral pathways. A state‐wide pelvic exenteration multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting was established in SA and the outcomes of this were audited and compared with historical data. Methods All patients referred for discussion between August 2021 and July 2022 to the SA State‐wide Pelvic Exenteration MDT were included in this study. MDT discussion centred around disease resectability, risk versus benefit of surgery, and need for local or interstate referral. Prospective data collection included patient demographics and MDT recommendations of surgery, palliation, or referral. Patients referred for surgery locally or interstate were compared with a retrospective patient cohort treated previously between January and December 2020. Results Over 12 months, 91 patients were discussed (including nine multiple times), by a mean of 18 meeting participants each month. Forty‐eight patients (58.5%) had primary malignancy, 25 (30.5%) recurrent malignancy, and 9 (11.0%) had non‐malignant disease. Colorectal cancer was the most common presentation (56.1%), followed by gynaecological (30.5%) and urological (6.1%) malignancy. Pelvic exenteration surgery was recommended to be performed locally in 53.7% of patients and the remainder for non‐surgical treatment, palliation, or re‐discussion. During this time, 44 patients underwent surgery locally (versus 34 in 2020) and only 4 referred interstate (versus 8 in 2020). Conclusion The establishment of a dedicated state‐wide pelvic exenteration MDT has resulted in better coordination of care for patients with locally advanced pelvic malignancy in SA, and significantly reduced the need for interstate referral. A dedicated state‐wide pelvic exenteration multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting was established in South Australia. This has resulted in better coordination of care for patients with locally advanced pelvic malignancy in SA, and significantly reduced the need for interstate referral.