A comparison of the performance of four low-bit-rate speech waveform coders

Subjective ratings were obtained for four different speech waveform coders of varying complexity at each of three bit rates (24, 16, and 9.6 kb/s). atc (adaptive transform coding) is rated the highest and adpcm-f (adaptive differential pcm with a fixed predictor) the lowest, regardless of bit rate....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBell System Technical Journal Vol. 58; no. 3; pp. 699 - 712
Main Authors Tribolet, J. M., Noll, P., McDermott, B. J., Crochiere, R. E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK American Telephone and Telegraph Company 01.03.1979
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Subjective ratings were obtained for four different speech waveform coders of varying complexity at each of three bit rates (24, 16, and 9.6 kb/s). atc (adaptive transform coding) is rated the highest and adpcm-f (adaptive differential pcm with a fixed predictor) the lowest, regardless of bit rate. Although there is large variability in the ratings due to different talkers and listeners, sbc (sub-band coding) is rated higher than adpcm-f and about equal to adpcm-v (adaptive differential pcm with a variable predictor) for most talkers and listeners. A weighted combination of two objective measures, one accounting for noise and the other for bandwidth effects, appears promising as a predictor of the subjective quality ratings.
Bibliography:istex:81B832C71EA647986B82B05CF2D305745E70802A
ArticleID:BLTJ2240
ark:/67375/WNG-1QMPJX0S-B
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0005-8580
2376-7154
1538-7305
DOI:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1979.tb02240.x