Balanced and integrated e-government implementation – exploring the crossroad of public policy-making and information systems project management processes

• Published in: Transforming government Vol. 12; no. 2; pp. 191 - 208
• Main Authors: Melin, Ulf, Wihlborg, Elin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bradford Emerald Publishing Limited 14.08.2018; Emerald Group Publishing Limited
• Subjects: Case studies; Concept formation; Decision making; Democracy; Digital government; Digitalization; e-government; Electronic government; Illustrations; Implementation; Incentives; Information systems; Internet; Management; Motivation; Policy making; Political science; Project management; Public policy; Public sector; Public services; Research design; Research methodology; Sustainability; Sustainable implementation; Policy making; Digitalization; Digital government; Sustainable implementation; e-government; Project management
• ISSN: 1750-6166; 1750-6174; 1750-6174
• DOI: 10.1108/TG-12-2017-0080

Purpose This paper aims to identify and elaborate on the various interpretations and implications of e-government as a process of public policy-making and as an act of information systems (IS) project management. The paper contributes to the search for a theoretical conceptualization by bridging policy project management and policy-making in public sector organizations at a crossroad of e-government to improve sustainable e-government research. Design/methodology/approach The research design of this paper focus on a model balancing the two research fields; public policy-making and analysis, and project management in the IS field. Through this model, four critical aspects of the processes are identified: objective, incentives/motivation, input/trigger and coordinative actor. These critical aspects are illustrated through findings from four case studies that are re-analyzed here. The cases show how the conceptual model through different dimensions can balance the two perspectives to reach a more sustainable outcome of e-government. Findings The paper shows that the two perspectives on e-government – public policy-making and project management – can be balanced and thereby reach a more sustainable outcome at this crossroad. The case studies re-visited in this paper are compared and serves as illustrations of these perspectives and different configurations of them in search for the crossroad. Research limitations/implications A main contribution of the paper is that e-government projects should be studied in, and taking both public policy-making and IS project management into account to be sustainable and successful. Even if the case studies have been conducted in Sweden, the conceptual results in this paper can be analytically generalized into other setting. However, there is a need for more comparative and conceptual studies in the field of e-government to shed light on the multi-faceted crossroads illustrated in this paper. Practical implications The paper offers new insights on how to integrate, bridge and even balance the two aspects of e-government policy aspects and projects management to achieve more sustainable and successful e-government. Originality/value The paper contributes to the literature by shedding light on the crossroad of policy aspects and IS project management approaches in the e-government field. The paper points at the need to further develop the understanding and design of e-government at the crossroad of information system models and political science concepts.