Comparative effectiveness of adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in the management of knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis

• Published in: World journal of orthopedics Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 23 - 41
• Main Authors: Muthu, Sathish, Patil, Sandesh C, Jeyaraman, Naveen, Jeyaraman, Madhan, Gangadaran, Prakash, Rajendran, Ramya Lakshmi, Oh, Eun Jung, Khanna, Manish, Chung, Ho Yun, Ahn, Byeong-Cheol
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 18.01.2023
• Subjects: Meta-Analysis; Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cell; Knee osteoarthritis; Bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cell; Cartilage regeneration; Efficacy; Mesenchymal stromal cell; Safety; Meta-analysis
• ISSN: 2218-5836; 2218-5836
• DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i1.23

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disorder, is associated with an increasing socioeconomic impact owing to the ageing population. To analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) and adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AD-MSCs) in knee OA management from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Independent and duplicate electronic database searches were performed, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, until August 2021 for RCTs that analyzed the efficacy and safety of AD-MSCs and BM-MSCs in the management of knee OA. The visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lysholm score, Tegner score, magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue score, knee osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), and adverse events were analyzed. Analysis was performed on the R-platform using OpenMeta (Analyst) software. Twenty-one studies, involving 936 patients, were included. Only one study compared the two MSC sources without patient randomization; hence, the results of all included studies from both sources were pooled, and a comparative critical analysis was performed. At six months, both AD-MSCs and BM-MSCs showed significant VAS improvement ( = 0.015, = 0.012); this was inconsistent at 1 year for BM-MSCs ( < 0.001, = 0.539), and AD-MSCs outperformed BM-MSCs compared to controls in measures such as WOMAC ( < 0.001, = 0.541), Lysholm scores ( = 0.006; = 0.933), and KOOS ( = 0.002; = 0.012). BM-MSC-related procedures caused significant adverse events ( = 0.003) compared to AD-MSCs ( = 0.673). Adipose tissue is superior to bone marrow because of its safety and consistent efficacy in improving pain and functional outcomes. Future trials are urgently warranted to validate our findings and reach a consensus on the ideal source of MSCs for managing knee OA.