Effectiveness of Human Research Protection Program Performance Measurements

We analyzed human research protection program performance metric data of all Department of Veterans Affairs research facilities obtained from 2010 to 2016. Among a total of 25 performance metrics, 21 (84%) showed improvement, four (16%) remained unchanged, and none deteriorated during the study peri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of empirical research on human research ethics Vol. 12; no. 4; pp. 217 - 228
Main Authors Tsan, Min-Fu, Nguyen, Yen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA Sage Publications, Ltd 01.10.2017
SAGE Publications
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1556-2646
1556-2654
1556-2654
DOI10.1177/1556264617720387

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We analyzed human research protection program performance metric data of all Department of Veterans Affairs research facilities obtained from 2010 to 2016. Among a total of 25 performance metrics, 21 (84%) showed improvement, four (16%) remained unchanged, and none deteriorated during the study period. The overall improvement from these 21 performance metrics was 81.1% ± 18.7% (mean ± SD), with a range of 30% to 100%. The four performance metrics that did not show improvement all had initial noncompliance/incidence rates of <1.0%, ranging from 0% to 0.98%. The initial noncompliance/incidence rates of the 21 performance metrics that showed improvement ranged from 0.05% to 60%. However, of the 21 performance metrics that showed improvement, 10 had initial noncompliance/incidence rates of <1.0%, suggesting that improvement could be achieved even with a very low initial noncompliance/incidence rate. We conclude that performance measurement is an effective tool in improving the performance of human research protection programs.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1556-2646
1556-2654
1556-2654
DOI:10.1177/1556264617720387