Clinical Hypotension with Co-prescription of Macrolide Antibiotics and Calcium-Channel Blockers in Haemodialysis Patients: A Retrospective Chart Review
Background Macrolide antibiotics inhibit the cytochrome p450 enzyme system, which metabolizes calcium-channel blockers. This may result in a clinically significant interaction, causing hypotension in patients co-prescribed these two drugs. Since these drugs are frequently used in the haemodialysis p...
Saved in:
Published in | Drug safety Vol. 36; no. 10; pp. 989 - 993 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Cham
Springer International Publishing
01.10.2013
Adis International Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
Macrolide antibiotics inhibit the cytochrome p450 enzyme system, which metabolizes calcium-channel blockers. This may result in a clinically significant interaction, causing hypotension in patients co-prescribed these two drugs. Since these drugs are frequently used in the haemodialysis population, we studied the effect of their co-prescription on actual blood pressure.
Methods
A retrospective chart review of all haemodialysis patients was conducted to identify patients co-prescribed a macrolide and a dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker. Blood pressure measurements before and during the macrolide co-prescription were abstracted and compared using a student’s
t
test.
Results
We identified 154 haemodialysis patients concurrently prescribed a macrolide antibiotic and a dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker. There was no significant difference in episodes of intra-dialytic hypotension or actual blood pressure measurements in the period before macrolide co-prescription and the period during macrolide co-prescription.
Conclusion
In contrast to hospitalized patients receiving dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers, concurrent administration of a macrolide antibiotic for infection did not result in hypotension in haemodialysis outpatients. Further research should be undertaken before a change in clinical practice against their co-prescription is considered. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0114-5916 1179-1942 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s40264-013-0088-9 |