Safety and Tolerability of an Eye Drop Based on 0.6% Povidone-Iodine Nanoemulsion in Dry Eye Patients

To evaluate safety and tolerability on the ocular surface of an anti-septic formulation containing 0.6% povidone-iodine (0.6% PVI) for a 4 week period. An observational, prospective study included 20 mild-moderate dry eye disease (DED) patients who enrolled at the Ocular Surface Disease Unit of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics Vol. 37; no. 2; p. 90
Main Authors Oliverio, Giovanni William, Spinella, Rosaria, Postorino, Elisa Imelde, Inferrera, Leandro, Aragona, Emanuela, Aragona, Pasquale
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.03.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To evaluate safety and tolerability on the ocular surface of an anti-septic formulation containing 0.6% povidone-iodine (0.6% PVI) for a 4 week period. An observational, prospective study included 20 mild-moderate dry eye disease (DED) patients who enrolled at the Ocular Surface Disease Unit of the University of Messina, receiving 0.6% PVI eye drops for 28 days, 2 drops twice daily (BID). The assessment included the Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire; symptoms score (0 = absent to 3 = severe) for burning, ocular dryness, foreign body sensation, watery eyes, tearing, photophobia, and ocular pain; fluorescein tear break-up time (TBUT); and corneal-conjunctival staining, performed at baseline (T0), after 7 (T7) and 28 (T28). Schirmer -test, corneal endothelial cell count, intraocular pressure, and fundus examination were performed at T0 and T28. The main outcome measures were TBUT and corneal-conjunctival staining as markers of ocular surface homeostasis. For statistical analysis, Student's -test and Wilcoxon test were used as appropriate. No significant alterations of the safety parameters were found throughout the study. Further, at T28 a significant improvement of burning, ocular dryness, foreign body sensation, and watery eyes (T0 vs. T28  < 0.03) were observed; corneal-conjunctival staining improved at T28 (T0 vs. T28  < 0.0001), and TBUT improved already at T7 (T0 vs. T7  = 0.0008) lasting so till the end of the study. The only adverse event was mild burning at instillation for the first 3 days of treatment in most of the patients. The treatment with 0.6% PVI was safe and well tolerated in a group of patients with a damaged ocular surface.
ISSN:1557-7732
DOI:10.1089/jop.2020.0085