Comparing first- and second-generation bioethanol by-products from sugarcane: Impact on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics

•Quality of bioethanol by-products impacts soil C and N dynamics.•1st generation by-products increased native soil C loss and N immobilization.•2nd generation by-product protected native soil C and increased N mineralization.•Bioethanol by-products temporarily decreased turnover time of soil microbi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGeoderma Vol. 384; no. C; p. 114818
Main Authors Bera, T., Inglett, K.S., Inglett, P.W., Vardanyan, L., Wilkie, A.C., O'Connor, G.A., Reddy, K.R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 15.02.2021
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Quality of bioethanol by-products impacts soil C and N dynamics.•1st generation by-products increased native soil C loss and N immobilization.•2nd generation by-product protected native soil C and increased N mineralization.•Bioethanol by-products temporarily decreased turnover time of soil microbial biomass. The first- and second-generation bioethanol by-products (bagasse and fermentation by-product, respectively) have different biochemical characteristics relating to carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) due to their production processes. To examine the impacts of fermentation by-product and bagasse on soil C and N dynamics, a 120 day laboratory incubation experiment was conducted by applying these amendments in soil at an equal carbon application rate (2.2 g C kg−1 soil). There was a significant increase in overall cumulative CO2-C production from amended soil compared to the control soil, though the loss was greatest in bagasse amended soil. However, δ13C-CO2 measurements suggested that fermentation by-product addition suppressed native soil C mineralization and prompted strong negative C priming (−57%). In contrast, bagasse amendment maintained similar native soil C mineralization to control soil. Decreased microbial biomass turnover time appears to be the major driving force for increased CO2-C production and soil C loss following bioethanol by-product amendments. Increased mineral N production indicated net N mineralization after fermentation by-product addition, while addition of bagasse resulted in lower N availability and N immobilization. Overall, results suggested that fermentation by-product application is advantageous in maintaining native soil C stock and N mineralization compared to bagasse. Thus, in a sustainable second-generation bioethanol production system, bagasse may be used for second-generation bioethanol production and the cogenerated by-product could be used as an amendment to improve soil C stock and N availability.
Bibliography:USDOE
ISSN:0016-7061
1872-6259
DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114818