Racism and jouissance: Evaluating the “racism as (the theft of) enjoyment” hypothesis

This paper introduces and evaluates the Lacanian idea that racism can be conceptualized both as a mode of enjoyment ( jouissance ) and as a reaction to the perceived “theft of enjoyment.” Despite the distinct analytical advantages of this conceptualization—which grapples with racism not merely as di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsychoanalysis, culture & society Vol. 23; no. 3; pp. 244 - 266
Main Author Hook, Derek
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Palgrave Macmillan UK 01.09.2018
Palgrave Macmillan
Subjects
Anthropology
Conscience
Cultural Studies
Hypotheses
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original Article
Psychoanalysis
Psychotherapy
Racism
superego
enjoyment
fantasy
Lacan
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:This paper introduces and evaluates the Lacanian idea that racism can be conceptualized both as a mode of enjoyment ( jouissance ) and as a reaction to the perceived “theft of enjoyment.” Despite the distinct analytical advantages of this conceptualization—which grapples with racism not merely as discourse or socio-historical construction but in its affective, embodied, sensuous, and fantasmatic dimensions—the “theft of enjoyment” hypothesis can nonetheless be critiqued as: (1) guilty of a depoliticizing psychological reductionism; (2) conceptually under-differentiated and overly inclusive in its field of reference; (3) inattentive to different modes of enjoyment; and (4) conceptually decontextualized, cut off from the associated psychoanalytic concepts that necessarily accompany its proper application. Responding to these critiques, and by way of a defence of the analytic value of this hypothesis, this paper argues that: (1) jouissance is more a sociological than a psychological concept; (2) the notion of enjoyment must remain empty of definitive contents if it is to serve as an anti-essentialist variable of analysis; (3) three inter-connected modes of jouissance should be distinguished (bodily excitation, libidinal treasure, and the surplus vitality of the other); and (4) a series of psychoanalytic notions (drive, fantasy, object petit a , superego) should necessarily accompany any rigorous analytical application of the notion of jouissance to the social field.
ISSN:1088-0763
1543-3390
DOI:10.1057/s41282-018-0106-z