Osteopontin and osteoprotegerin in atherosclerotic plaque - are they significant markers of plaque vulnerability?

• Published in: Romanian journal of morphology and embryology Vol. 61; no. 3; pp. 793 - 801
• Main Authors: Strobescu-Ciobanu, Cristina, Giuşcă, Simona Eliza, Căruntu, Irina Draga, Amălinei, Cornelia, Rusu, Andreea, Cojocaru, Elena, Popa, Radu Florin, Lupaşcu, Cristian Dumitru
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Romania Academy of Medical Sciences, Romanian Academy Publishing House, Bucharest 01.01.2020
• Subjects: Biomarkers; Female; Humans; Male; Original Paper; Osteopontin; Osteoprotegerin; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Vascular Calcification
• ISSN: 1220-0522; 2066-8279
• DOI: 10.47162/RJME.61.3.17

Atherosclerosis (ATS) is still considered as a major, global health problem. For a deeper understanding of its pathogenesis, in the last years the research was translated from tissue visible events to molecular mechanisms. Osteopontin (OPN) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) are two molecules that have been associated with the initiation and progression of ATS lesions. The aim of our study was to assess the OPN and OPG expression in advanced stages of carotid ATS, to analyze the correlation between these markers and the ultrasonographic plaque properties, pointing out the identification of possible patterns that can predict plaque vulnerability and risks of restenosis. The study group comprised 49 consecutive patients (38 males and 11 females) diagnosed with carotid stenotic lesions by using ultrasonography. The carotid endarterectomy specimens were standardly processed for histopathological and immunohistochemical exams. The OPN and OPG expression was semi-quantitatively assessed. Our results sustained the relationship between histological American Heart Association (AHA) type and ultrasonographic classification (echogenic versus echolucent) (p<0.001). The semi-quantitative analysis showed that in most cases (31 plaques) OPG and OPN had opposite expressions, whereas in the remaining cases (18 plaques) the expression was similar. There were no correlations between low versus high expression of intra-plaque OPN and OPG (p=0.335). We found significant correlation for OPN and plaque echogenicity (p=0.011), but not for OPG (p=0.079). OPN expression (low versus high) was correlated with plaque type (stable versus unstable) (p=0.036), plaque ulceration (p=0.009) and inflammation (p<0.001). OPG expression (low versus high) did not reveal statistically significant differences with plaque type (stable versus unstable) and vulnerability plaque parameters, respectively. OPG and OPN co-exist in carotid atherosclerotic plaque demonstrating a modulatory role in inflammatory and calcification processes. OPG is strongly expressed in stable, calcified plaques, while OPN is poorly expressed in calcified plaques and in plaques without hemorrhage, ulceration, inflammation, or necrosis. Starting from the molecular mechanisms, further studies of biomarkers are important to identify new therapeutic resources meant to prevent and treat vascular calcification.