Working Memory Has Better Fidelity Than Long-Term Memory The Fidelity Constraint Is Not a General Property of Memory After All

How detailed are long-term-memory representations compared with working memory representations? Recent research has found an equal fidelity bound for both memory systems, suggesting a novel general constraint on memory. Here, we assessed the replicability of this discovery. Participants (total N = 7...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsychological science Vol. 30; no. 2; pp. 223 - 237
Main Authors Biderman, Natalie, Luria, Roy, Teodorescu, Andrei R., Hajaj, Ron, Goshen-Gottstein, Yonatan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA Sage Publications, Inc 01.02.2019
SAGE Publications
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:How detailed are long-term-memory representations compared with working memory representations? Recent research has found an equal fidelity bound for both memory systems, suggesting a novel general constraint on memory. Here, we assessed the replicability of this discovery. Participants (total N = 72) were presented with colored real-life objects and were asked to recall the colors using a continuous color wheel. Deviations from study colors were modeled to generate two estimates of color memory: the variability of remembered colors—fidelity—and the probability of forgetting the color. Estimating model parameters using both maximum-likelihood estimation and Bayesian hierarchical modeling, we found that working memory had better fidelity than long-term memory (Experiments 1 and 2). Furthermore, within each system, fidelity worsened as a function of time-correlated mechanisms (Experiments 2 and 3). We conclude that fidelity is subject to decline across and within memory systems. Thus, the justification for a general fidelity constraint in memory does not seem to be valid.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0956-7976
1467-9280
1467-9280
DOI:10.1177/0956797618813538