Simple Comparative Analyses of Differentially Expressed Gene Lists May Overestimate Gene Overlap

Comparing the overlap between sets of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) within or between transcriptome studies is regularly used to infer similarities between biological processes. Significant overlap between two sets of DEGs is usually determined by a simple test. The number of potentially ove...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of computational biology Vol. 25; no. 6; p. 606
Main Authors Lawhorn, Chelsea M, Schomaker, Rachel, Rowell, Jonathan T, Rueppell, Olav
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.06.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Comparing the overlap between sets of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) within or between transcriptome studies is regularly used to infer similarities between biological processes. Significant overlap between two sets of DEGs is usually determined by a simple test. The number of potentially overlapping genes is compared to the number of genes that actually occur in both lists, treating every gene as equal. However, gene expression is controlled by transcription factors that bind to a variable number of transcription factor binding sites, leading to variation among genes in general variability of their expression. Neglecting this variability could therefore lead to inflated estimates of significant overlap between DEG lists. With computer simulations, we demonstrate that such biases arise from variation in the control of gene expression. Significant overlap commonly arises between two lists of DEGs that are randomly generated, assuming that the control of gene expression is variable among genes but consistent between corresponding experiments. More overlap is observed when transcription factors are specific to their binding sites and when the number of genes is considerably higher than the number of different transcription factors. In contrast, overlap between two DEG lists is always lower than expected when the genetic architecture of expression is independent between the two experiments. Thus, the current methods for determining significant overlap between DEGs are potentially confounding biologically meaningful overlap with overlap that arises due to variability in control of expression among genes, and more sophisticated approaches are needed.
ISSN:1557-8666
DOI:10.1089/cmb.2017.0262