Techno-economic analysis of the impact of dynamic electricity prices on solar penetration in a smart grid environment with distributed energy storage

• Published in: Applied energy Vol. 282; no. PA; p. 116168
• Main Authors: Sheha, Moataz, Mohammadi, Kasra, Powell, Kody
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Ltd 15.01.2021; Elsevier
• Subjects: Bilevel programming; Distributed energy storage; Dynamic optimization; Dynamic pricing profiles; Energy & Fuels; Engineering; Overgeneration; Solar penetration; Overgeneration; Bilevel programming; Dynamic pricing profiles; Solar penetration; Dynamic optimization; Distributed energy storage
• ISSN: 0306-2619; 1872-9118
• DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116168

•Novel non-cooperative Stackelberg game for flattening the duck curve.•Leveraging dynamic prices to increase solar penetration through demand-side.•Mitigation of the problems of overgeneration and photovoltaic curtailment.•Incorporating the economics of both the supply and demand-sides.•A 300 MW solar plant with 597 kWh battery have solar penetration up to 67.78%. This study investigates the technical and economic feasibility of using high levels of solar energy penetration up to 400 MW into a smart grid system of 60,000 smart houses. A novel non-cooperative Stackelberg game is introduced that incorporates the profitability of the supply-side and helps in solving problems related to overgeneration and photovoltaic curtailment. The non-cooperative game is intended to find the optimal dynamic prices that would leverage distributed storage through the demand-side to stabilize the power grid operation. Ten cases are studied with five photovoltaic plant sizes and two battery designs. A novel quantitative analysis of high levels of solar penetration as a percentage of the total electricity demand is introduced to evaluate the technical feasibility of the studied cases. To evaluate the economic viability of the proposed smart grid system, four metrics were used: the levelized cost of energy, the levelized cost of storage, the payback period, and the net present value. Two out of ten studied cases were concluded to be the most promising cases, one with a solar photovoltaic plant size of 200 MW and the other with 300 MW. The case with 300 MW solar plant is preferred as it paves the way for more solar energy deployment with a solar penetration percentage up to 67.78%. This case had a payback period of 10.72 years and a net present value of $51.44 M for the solar plant and a payback period of 12.06 years and a net present value of $40.75 M for the demand-side.