Automated protein identification by tandem mass spectrometry: Issues and strategies

Protein identification by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is key to most proteomics projects and has been widely explored in bioinformatics research. Obtaining good and trustful identification results has important implications for biological and clinical work. Although well matured, automated soft...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMass spectrometry reviews Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 235 - 254
Main Authors Hernandez, Patricia, Müller, Markus, Appel, Ron D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.03.2006
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Protein identification by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is key to most proteomics projects and has been widely explored in bioinformatics research. Obtaining good and trustful identification results has important implications for biological and clinical work. Although well matured, automated software identification of proteins from MS/MS data still faces a number of obstacles due to the complexity of the proteome or procedural issues of mass spectrometry data acquisition. Expected or unexpected modifications of the peptide sequences, polymorphisms, errors in databases, missed or non‐specific cleavages, unusual fragmentation patterns, and single MS/MS spectra of multiple peptides of the same m/z are so many pitfalls for identification algorithms. A lot of research work has been carried out in recent years that yielded new strategies to handle a number of these issues. Multiple MS/MS identification algorithms are now available or have been theoretically described. The difficulty resides in choosing the most adapted method for each type of spectra being identified. This review presents an overview of the state‐of‐the‐art bioinformatics approaches to the identification of proteins by MS/MS to help the reader doing the spadework of finding the right tools among the many possibilities offered. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Mass Spec Rev 25:235–254, 2006
Bibliography:istex:8E16ED9B3855D40A2C6F650087C934C203C5C731
ArticleID:MAS20068
ark:/67375/WNG-P599SJ7V-M
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0277-7037
1098-2787
DOI:10.1002/mas.20068