Noninvasive diagnosis of acute cellular rejection in liver transplant recipients: A proteomic signature validated by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay

• Published in: Liver transplantation Vol. 17; no. 6; pp. 723 - 732
• Main Authors: Massoud, Omar, Heimbach, Julie, Viker, Kimberly, Krishnan, Anuradha, Poterucha, John, Sanchez, William, Watt, Kymberly, Wiesner, Russell, Charlton, Michael
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.06.2011
• Subjects: Adult; Alanine Transaminase - blood; Biomarkers - blood; Biopsy; Complement C4 - metabolism; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods; Female; Graft Rejection - blood; Graft Rejection - diagnosis; Graft Rejection - pathology; Hepatitis C - surgery; Humans; Liver - metabolism; Liver - pathology; Liver Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Proteomics; Sensitivity and Specificity; Transplantation
• ISSN: 1527-6465; 1527-6473
• DOI: 10.1002/lt.22266

The diagnosis of acute cellular rejection (ACR) requires liver biopsy with its attendant expense and risk. Our first aim was to prospectively determine in an exploratory analysis whether there is a serum proteome signature associated with histologically confirmed ACR. Our second aim was to use simpler and faster enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)‐based assays for proteins identified as differentially abundant in the proteomic analysis to identify patients with ACR in a separate validation cohort. We used sequential high‐abundance protein depletion and isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry to characterize the serum proteome in serum samples of patients with or without ACR. Seven of the 41 proteins identified as differentially abundant [serum amyloid A, complement component 4 (C4), fibrinogen, complement component 1q (C1q), complement component 3, heat shock protein 60 (HSP60), and HSP70] could be measured with ELISA‐based assays in a validation cohort consisting of patients with ACR (n = 25) and patients without ACR (n = 21). The mean alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels in patients with ACR and in patients without ACR were 198 ± 27 and 153 ± 34 U/L, respectively. Among the 7 proteins for which ELISA assays were available, C4 and C1q were both independent predictors of ACR. C4 had the greatest predictivity for differentiating patients with or without ACR. A C4 level ≤ 0.31 g/L had a sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 62%, a positive predictive value of 74%, and a negative predictive value of 94%. A C4 level ≤ 0.31 g/L and an ALT level ≥ 70 IU/mL together had a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 81%, a positive predictive value of 86%, and a negative predictive value of 94%. In summary, in this exploratory analysis, serum C4 and ALT levels were highly predictive of ACR in liver transplant recipients. Confirmation in a prospective, larger, and diverse population is needed. Liver Transpl 17:723‐732, 2011. © 2011 AASLD.