Lung Delivery of Indacaterol and Mometasone Furoate Following Inhalation of QMF149 in Healthy Volunteers

This single‐dose, 4‐period crossover study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the β2‐agonist indacaterol maleate and the corticosteroid mometasone furoate (MF) after inhalation of a fixed‐dose combination (QMF149, indacaterol maleate/MF, 500/400 μg) via the Twisthaler (TH) device with and withou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical pharmacology in drug development Vol. 5; no. 4; pp. 285 - 295
Main Authors Vaidya, Soniya S., Khindri, Sanjeev, Maahs, Suzanne, Machineni, Surendra, Hara, Hisanori, Juan, Axel, Kaiser, Günther
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This single‐dose, 4‐period crossover study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the β2‐agonist indacaterol maleate and the corticosteroid mometasone furoate (MF) after inhalation of a fixed‐dose combination (QMF149, indacaterol maleate/MF, 500/400 μg) via the Twisthaler (TH) device with and without activated charcoal and postdose mouth rinsing in healthy volunteers. The PK of indacaterol maleate 300 μg inhaled via the Breezhaler (BRZ) device was also characterized. Relative bioavailability of indacaterol and MF for inhalation with versus without charcoal, based on AUClast, was 0.25 (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.18–0.35) and 0.70 (90%CI, 0.52–0.93), respectively. Thus, 25% and 70% of systemic exposure of indacaterol and MF, respectively was due to pulmonary absorption and 75% and 30%, respectively, was due to gastrointestinal absorption. Mouth rinsing reduced the systemic exposure of indacaterol by approximately 35% but had no relevant effect on the exposure of MF. Dose‐normalized AUClast for indacaterol inhaled via the BRZ device was 2.3‐fold higher than QMF149 via the TH device. All treatments had a good safety profile and were well tolerated. Data from this study and comparison with inhalation of indacaterol via the BRZ device suggest that the latter was more efficient than the TH device regarding lung delivery of indacaterol.
Bibliography:istex:B98DCF2CE612A599C5092C3EE454FB44D4E63366
ark:/67375/WNG-HVCK2DTW-W
ArticleID:CPDD245
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:2160-763X
2160-7648
2160-7648
DOI:10.1002/cpdd.245