Biological markers and small cell carcinoma of the lung. A clinical evaluation of urinary ribonucleosides

Five minor base ribonucleosides, primarily degradation products of transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA), were evaluated as potential biological markers for patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung. The urinary concentration for pseudouridine, 1‐methyladenosine, 1‐methylinosine, N2‐methylguanosine,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer Vol. 50; no. 11; pp. 2457 - 2464
Main Authors Waalkes, T. Phillip, Abeloff, Martin D., Ettinger, David S., Woo, Kwang B., Gehrke, Charles W., Kuo, Kenneth C., Borek, Ernest
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.12.1982
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Five minor base ribonucleosides, primarily degradation products of transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA), were evaluated as potential biological markers for patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung. The urinary concentration for pseudouridine, 1‐methyladenosine, 1‐methylinosine, N2‐methylguanosine, and N2,N2‐dimethylguanosine was determined by means of reversed‐phase high performance liquid chromatography and quantitatively expressed as a function of creatinine excretion. Comparisons were made with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) plasma levels. The total frequency of elevated values for the five nucleosides in pretreatment urine samples was directly related to stage of disease with 24/60 (40%) determinations increased in 12 patients with limited disease and 69/85 (81%) in 17 patients with extensive disease. For these same patients, CEA levels were elevated respectively in 2/11 (18%) of the former and 9/17 (53%) of the latter group. The frequency and degree of elevation of the nucleoside/creatinine ratios in pretreatment samples from patients with extensive disease was correlated directly with increasing number of metastatic sites. Of the five nucleosides, the mean number elevated was two for limited disease, 3–4 for extensive disease with one metastatic site, 4 for two or three, and 5 for four or more sites of metastases. Based on a summation of pretreatment nucleoside/creatinine ratios, a discriminant for survival was derived giving curves separating patients (P = 0.086) similar to the discriminant based on stage of disease. Although discordant results were noted, an overall correlation of 75% agreement with clinical assessment was estimated in response categories when monitoring changes associated with therapy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/1097-0142(19821201)50:11<2457::AID-CNCR2820501134>3.0.CO;2-S