A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled, Phase II Study of Regorafenib Versus Placebo in Advanced/Metastatic, Treatment‐Refractory Liposarcoma: Results from the SARC024 Study

Lessons Learned The results from the liposarcoma cohort of SARC024 confirm previously published data and do not support the routine use of regorafenib in this patient population. Continued exploration of novel therapies, including combination approaches, is warranted for a patient population in whom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe oncologist (Dayton, Ohio) Vol. 25; no. 11; pp. e1655 - e1662
Main Authors Riedel, Richard F., Ballman, Karla V., Lu, Yao, Attia, Steven, Loggers, Elizabeth T., Ganjoo, Kristen N., Livingston, Michael B., Chow, Warren, Wright, Jennifer, Ward, John H., Rushing, Daniel, Okuno, Scott H., Reed, Damon R., Liebner, David A., Keedy, Vicki L., Mascarenhas, Leo, Davis, Lara E., Ryan, Christopher, Reinke, Denise K., Maki, Robert G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.11.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Lessons Learned The results from the liposarcoma cohort of SARC024 confirm previously published data and do not support the routine use of regorafenib in this patient population. Continued exploration of novel therapies, including combination approaches, is warranted for a patient population in whom limited treatment options exist. Background Regorafenib is a multitargeted kinase inhibitor with a kinase profile overlapping, but distinct from, pazopanib, an agent approved for recurrent and metastatic non‐gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), non‐adipocytic soft tissue sarcoma. We conducted a randomized, phase II study of regorafenib versus placebo in refractory liposarcoma patients. Methods Patients with advanced or metastatic, treatment‐refractory liposarcoma were randomized 1:1 to receive regorafenib 160 mg or placebo once daily (3 weeks on, 1 week off). Patients with well‐differentiated liposarcoma only were excluded. Crossover for placebo was allowed upon progression. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS), according to RECIST version 1.1. Results Forty‐eight subjects with liposarcoma (34 dedifferentiated, 12 myxoid/round cell, 2 pleomorphic) were enrolled. Median PFS was 1.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92–3.67) months for regorafenib versus 2.07 (95% CI, 1.64–3.44) months for placebo; stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.85 (95% CI, 0.46, 1.58), p = .62. No responses were seen on regorafenib. One PR was observed on placebo. Median overall survival was 6.46 (95% CI, 4.16–23.48) months for regorafenib and 4.89 (95% CI, 3.02–9.77) months for placebo, stratified HR, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.31–1.40), p = .28). Treatment‐related adverse events were similar to the known safety profile of regorafenib. Conclusion Regorafenib did not appear to improve PFS in treatment‐refractory liposarcoma. No new significant safety signals were observed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
No part of this article may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted in any form or for any means without the prior permission in writing from the copyright holder. For information on purchasing reprints contact Commercialreprints@wiley.com. For permission information contact permissions@wiley.com.
ISSN:1083-7159
1549-490X
1549-490X
DOI:10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0679