The shallow-decay phase in both the optical and X-ray afterglows of Swift GRB 090529A: energy injection into a wind-type medium?
The energy injection model is the usual choice for interpreting the shallow-decay phase in Swift gamma-ray burst (GRB) X-ray afterglows. However, very few GRBs have simultaneous signatures of energy injection in their optical and X-ray afterglows. Here, we report on the optical observations of GRB 0...
Saved in:
Published in | Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Vol. 422; no. 3; pp. 2044 - 2050 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.05.2012
Oxford University Press |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The energy injection model is the usual choice for interpreting the shallow-decay phase in Swift gamma-ray burst (GRB) X-ray afterglows. However, very few GRBs have simultaneous signatures of energy injection in their optical and X-ray afterglows. Here, we report on the optical observations of GRB 090529A from 2000 s to ∼106 s after the burst, in which an achromatic decay is seen at both wavelengths. The optical light curve shows a decay from 0.37 to 0.99, with a break at ∼105 s. In the same time interval, the decay indices of the X-ray light curve changed from 0.04 to 1.2. Comparing these values with the closure relations, the segment after 3 × 104 s is consistent with the prediction of the forward shock in an interstellar medium without any energy injection. The shallow-decay phase between 2000 and 3 × 104 s could be a result of the external shock in a wind-type medium with an energy injection under the condition of νo < νc < νx. However, the constraint of the spectral region is not consistent with the multiband observations. For this shallow-decay phase, other models are also possible, such as energy injection with evolving microphysical parameters, a jet viewed off-axis, etc. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0035-8711 1365-2966 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20681.x |