Simultaneous Approach of Colo-Rectal and Hepatic Lesions in Colo-Rectal Cancers with Liver Metastasis - A Single Oncological Center Overview
Management of synchronous colorectal cancer with liver metastases (SCLM) is still on debate, regarding timing, indications and complications of the 3 strategies: classic approach (first tumor resection), simultaneous resection and reverse approach (liver first). A retrospective single-centre evaluat...
Saved in:
Published in | Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990) Vol. 118; no. 3; pp. 237 - 249 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Romania
01.06.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Management of synchronous colorectal cancer with liver metastases (SCLM) is still on debate, regarding timing, indications and complications of the 3 strategies: classic approach (first tumor resection), simultaneous resection and reverse approach (liver first). A retrospective single-centre evaluation of synchronous approach was accomplished, focusing on surgical technique, indications and complications. Material and
Between 2017 and 2020, 31 SCLM patients benefited from synchronously colorectal and hepatic approach: segmental colectomies/rectal resections, simultaneously with liver metastasectomies (associated with radiofrequency ablation). Post-therapeutic imaging monitoring was performed from every 3 - 6 months. There were no perioperative complications related to the combination of the procedures, low morbidity and zero postoperative mortality.
The follow-up period was 10 - 40 months: 13 patients had no evidence of recurrence, 10 had hepatic metastases in regression, 4 patients had signs of peritoneal carcinomatosis and 4 showed progression of liver disease; all patients were on chemotherapy. During follow-up 4 patients died.
Experience shows that the simultaneous approach of recto-colic and hepatic resections in colo-rectal cancers is a safe procedure, with low morbidity, the limits being dictated by the size of the liver metastases. The results at long-distance must be drawn by further consistent trials. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1221-9118 |
DOI: | 10.21614/chirurgia.2023.v.118.i.3.p.237 |