Evaluation of renal masses with contrast-enhanced rapid acquisition spin echo MR imaging

To assess the use of dynamic contrast-enhanced rapid acquisition spin-echo (RASE) imaging for the detection and characterization of renal masses, we evaluated 18 patients with CT evidence of 67 renal masses. The masses included 58 simple cysts, 8 solid neoplasms, and 1 pseudotumor. Patients were exa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMagnetic resonance imaging Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 7 - 16
Main Authors Eilenberg, Steven S., Brown, Jefferey J., Lee, Joseph K.T., Heiken, Jay P., Mirowitz, Scott A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 1993
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To assess the use of dynamic contrast-enhanced rapid acquisition spin-echo (RASE) imaging for the detection and characterization of renal masses, we evaluated 18 patients with CT evidence of 67 renal masses. The masses included 58 simple cysts, 8 solid neoplasms, and 1 pseudotumor. Patients were examined with standard spin-echo (SE) pulse sequences including pre- and postcontrast T 1-weighted images and noncontrast T 2-weighted images as well as pre- and postcontrast RASE images. Each pulse sequence was reviewed individually and in a group with other pulse sequences by two blinded observers. The performance of contrast-enhanced RASE imaging either alone or in combination with a T 2-weighted SE sequence resulted in improved diagnostic accuracy compared with unenhanced conventional SE and RASE sequences. The contrast-enhanced RASE sequence outperformed the contrast-enhanced T 1-weighted SE sequence for one observer; similar diagnostic accuracy was achieved with the two examinations by the other observer. Combining the T 2-weighted sequence with contrast-enhanced RASE images did not increase lesion detection but did increase the observers' confidence in making the diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging resulted in significant improvement in the detection and characterization of renal lesions compared to unenhanced MR imaging.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0730-725X
1873-5894
DOI:10.1016/0730-725X(93)90406-4