Making agency theory work for supply chain relationships: a systematic review across four disciplines

PurposeContemporary supply chain relationships inherently rely on delegation of work between organizations and, thus, are subject to agency problems for which a wide range of governance mechanisms exist. This review of agency theory (AT), across four distinct fields, explains the connection between...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of operations & production management Vol. 42; no. 13; pp. 299 - 334
Main Authors Matinheikki, Juri, Kauppi, Katri, Brandon–Jones, Alistair, van Raaij, Erik M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bradford Emerald Publishing Limited 19.12.2022
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:PurposeContemporary supply chain relationships inherently rely on delegation of work between organizations and, thus, are subject to agency problems for which a wide range of governance mechanisms exist. This review of agency theory (AT), across four distinct fields, explains the connection between governance mechanisms and supply chain relationship types.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses a systematic literature review (SLR) of articles using AT in a supply chain context from the operations and supply chain management, general management, marketing, and economics fields.FindingsThe authors categorize the governance mechanisms identified to create a typology of agency relationships in supply chains.Research limitations/implicationsThe developed typology provides parsimonious theory on different forms of supply chain agency relationships and takes a step towards a “supply chain-oriented agency theory” explaining and predicting relationship types and governance in supply chains. Furthermore, a future research agenda calls for more accurate measuring of agency costs, to examine residual gains alongside residual losses, to take a dual-sided perspective of agency relations and to adopt AT to examine more complex supply networks.Practical implicationsThe review provides a menu of governance mechanisms and describes situations under which these mechanisms could be deployed to guide managers when developing their supply chain relationships.Originality/valueThe first review to combine and elaborate views from four major disciplines using AT as a lens to supply chain relationships. Expanding the traditional set of governance mechanisms provides academics and practitioners with a bigger “menu” of options to consider.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0144-3577
1758-6593
DOI:10.1108/IJOPM-12-2021-0757