Evaluation of the anaesthetic properties and tolerance of 1:100,000 articaine versus 1:100,000 lidocaine. A comparative study in surgery of the lower third molar

• Published in: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal Vol. 17; no. 2; pp. e345 - e351
• Main Authors: Martínez-Rodríguez, N, Barona-Dorado, C, Martín-Arés, M, Cortés-Bretón-Brinkman, J, Martínez-González, J-M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Spain Medicina Oral S.L 01.03.2012
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia, Dental; Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage; Anesthetics, Local - adverse effects; Carticaine - administration & dosage; Carticaine - adverse effects; Clinical and Experimental Dentistry; Female; Humans; Lidocaine - administration & dosage; Lidocaine - adverse effects; Male; Middle Aged; Molar, Third - surgery; Single-Blind Method; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1698-6946; 1698-4447; 1698-6946
• DOI: 10.4317/medoral.17414

To evaluate the anaesthetic properties and tolerance of articaine versus lidocaine at equal vasoconstrictor concentration. A total of 96 male and female patients who underwent surgical treatment of the lower third molar participated. Patients were randomly assigned to articaine hydrochloride with epinephrine 1:100,000 and lidocaine hydrochloride with epinephrine 1:100,000. The variables analysed were latency period, duration of anaesthetic effect, tolerance and adverse reactions. Both the latency period and the duration of anaesthetic effect were greater for articaine, although the differences were not statistically significant. Latency: mean difference of 2.70 ± 2.12 minutes (95%CI of -1.51 minutes - 6.92 minutes). mean difference of -33 minutes 5 seconds ± 31 minutes (95% CI -1 hour 35 minutes - 29 minutes). There were 4 adverse events that did not require the patients to be withdrawn from the study. The anaesthetics in this study have very similar properties for use in surgery and have demonstrated a good safety and tolerability profile.