Divergence of biological and chronological aging: Evidence from rodent studies

Literature on aging populations of rodents supports the intuitive view that significant functional variation exists among like-aged, elderly individuals: chronological age as a solitary measure is a poor indicator of biological age. In this report, we review a variety of studies which classify aged...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeurobiology of aging Vol. 12; no. 6; pp. 685 - 693
Main Authors Collier, Timothy J., Coleman, Paul D.
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published London Elsevier Inc 01.11.1991
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Literature on aging populations of rodents supports the intuitive view that significant functional variation exists among like-aged, elderly individuals: chronological age as a solitary measure is a poor indicator of biological age. In this report, we review a variety of studies which classify aged rodents based on genetic and/or behavioral similarities, in addition to chronological age, and have provided valuable neurobiological and physiological information on age-related changes which accompany functional impairments, or the lack of them. Beyond their descriptive value for gerontological research, these findings suggest ways in which biological aging can be manipulated to promote good function in aged individuals.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0197-4580
1558-1497
DOI:10.1016/0197-4580(91)90122-Z