Two-dimensional electron microscopic analysis of the chalice form of phosphorylase kinase

Phosphorylase kinase ( M r 1.3 × 10 6), a Ca 2+-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase, plays a key role in the initiation of glycogenolysis. After purification on hydroxylapatite, the negatively stained enzyme was used for electron microscopy. In electron micrographs, phosphorylase kinase shows two ma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of molecular biology Vol. 181; no. 4; pp. 503 - 516
Main Authors Schramm, H.J., Jennissen, H.P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 20.02.1985
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Phosphorylase kinase ( M r 1.3 × 10 6), a Ca 2+-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase, plays a key role in the initiation of glycogenolysis. After purification on hydroxylapatite, the negatively stained enzyme was used for electron microscopy. In electron micrographs, phosphorylase kinase shows two major molecular forms: a butterfly form (approx. 60%) and a chalice form (approx. 40%). Images of the chalice form of the enzyme were computer-averaged by the method of single particle averaging. The following apparent molecular dimensions were obtained from the averages: total height, 20 nm; maximal width, 18 nm. The chalice form of phosphorylase kinase consists of a major structure termed the cup (11 nm × 18 nm), containing a large accessible cleft, and a minor structure termed the stem (8 nm × 9 nm). A closer examination of the images by averaging of molecular parts revealed two subpopulations of the cup part: a flexed (closed) type and an extended (open) type. The orifice, which can be closed partly by two protrusions (I, I′), is about 6 nm wide when the protrusions are flexed and 9 nm wide when they are extended. It is suggested that the substrates, e.g. phosphorylase b, may be accommodated in the large cleft of the enzyme. While the orientation of the protrusions (I, I′) is the most obvious difference between the two types, more structural differences can be detected, suggesting a concerted movement of the protein domains against each other.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-2836
1089-8638
DOI:10.1016/0022-2836(85)90423-1