Age-related differences in recall and recognition: a meta-analysis

• Published in: Psychonomic bulletin & review Vol. 26; no. 5; pp. 1529 - 1547
• Main Authors: Rhodes, Stephen, Greene, Nathaniel R., Naveh-Benjamin, Moshe
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.10.2019; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Age differences; Aging; Behavioral Science and Psychology; Cognitive Aging - physiology; Cognitive Psychology; Humans; Memory; Memory - physiology; Memory, Episodic; Mental Recall - physiology; Meta-analysis; Older people; Psychology; Recognition, Psychology - physiology; Systematic review; Theoretical Review; Recall; Cognitive aging; Episodic memory; Recognition
• ISSN: 1069-9384; 1531-5320
• DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01649-y

Relative to younger adults, older adults tend to perform more poorly on tests of both free recall and item recognition memory. The age difference in performance is typically larger for recall tasks relative to those involving recognition. However, there have been reports of comparable age-related differences in free recall and item recognition performance. Further, a differential performance cost does not necessarily mean that processes involved in recall are specifically affected by age. Here we present a meta-analysis of 36 articles reporting 89 direct comparisons of free recall and item recognition in younger and older groups of participants. Standardized effect sizes reveal that age differences are larger for recall tasks (Hedges’ g = 0.89, 95% confidence intervals [0.75, 1.03]) than for recognition tasks (0.54, [0.37, 0.72]). Further, Brinley analyses of the data suggest that distinct functions are needed to relate younger and older performance for the two tasks. These functions differ in intercept pointing to a disproportionate age difference in recall relative to recognition. This is in line with theories of memory and aging which posit specific deficits in processes related to search and retrieval from memory.