Genotyping compared with protein phenotyping of the common apolipoprotein E polymorphism

Apolipoprotein E (apo E) genotypes have been determined in 460 Danish men, with the use of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify a 244 base pair fragment spanning the first-base polymorphic sites in the codons of amino acids 112 and 158 followed by restriction endonuclease cleavage. The res...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinica chimica acta Vol. 224; no. 2; pp. 131 - 137
Main Authors Hansen, P.S., Gerdes, L.U., Klausen, I.C., Gregersen, N., Faergeman, O.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Shannon Elsevier B.V 31.01.1994
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Apolipoprotein E (apo E) genotypes have been determined in 460 Danish men, with the use of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify a 244 base pair fragment spanning the first-base polymorphic sites in the codons of amino acids 112 and 158 followed by restriction endonuclease cleavage. The results were compared with the apo E phenotypes previously determined by isoelectric focusing (IEF) of delipidated plasma, not pretreated with neuraminidase, followed by apo E specific immunoblotting. Conflicting results were found in only 9 cases (2.0%) and in each case only with respect to one allele. Five of the discrepancies can be explained, post hoc, by technical difficulties with the IEF method (‘faint bands’). A possible cause of the other 4 discrepancies is the presence of rare mutations. Our findings in this large study are reassuring, since, if appreciable and systematic misclassification of genotypes do occur by using IEF, as has been reported from some laboratories, it may influence the validity of genetic epidemiological studies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0009-8981
1873-3492
DOI:10.1016/0009-8981(94)90179-1