Role-Playing in a Vaccination Debate Strengthens Student Scientific Debate Skills for Various Audiences

Students are surrounded by strongly-held viewpoints on scientific topics and frequently discuss news reports with their classmates. We developed the vaccination debate exercise to leverage this interest and develop core higher-order cognitive skills (HOCS), including, but not limited to, the ability...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of microbiology & biology education Vol. 17; no. 2; pp. 297 - 299
Main Authors Souza, Gianne, Mixter, Philip F
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Society of Microbiology 01.05.2016
American Society for Microbiology
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Students are surrounded by strongly-held viewpoints on scientific topics and frequently discuss news reports with their classmates. We developed the vaccination debate exercise to leverage this interest and develop core higher-order cognitive skills (HOCS), including, but not limited to, the ability to critique public media or primary research sources and create arguments for defending multiple viewpoints. Students prepared to debate different sides of the topic and then randomly assumed one of the roles: “Physician” (pro-vaccine), “Activist” (anti-vaccination), or “Parent-on-the-fence” (undecided). Students reported an increase in their abilities to discuss scientific topics with diverse audiences and an increased awareness of importance of examining Internet sources for credibility.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1935-7877
1935-7885
DOI:10.1128/jmbe.v17i2.998