Midtrimester chorionic villus sampling: An alternative approach?

Objective: Our purpose was to audit midtrimester chorionic villus sampling after a positive maternal serum screening test for autosomal trisomy. Study Design: From January 1990 until July 1993 chorionic villus sampling was offered to all screened positive women. Results: Five hundred fifty-one mothe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology Vol. 171; no. 4; pp. 1035 - 1037
Main Authors Cameron, Alan D., Murphy, Karl W., McNay, Margaret B., Mathers, Alan M., Kingdom, John, Aitken, David A., Crossley, Jennifer, Imrie, Stuart, Lowther, Gordon
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia, PA Elsevier Inc 01.10.1994
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: Our purpose was to audit midtrimester chorionic villus sampling after a positive maternal serum screening test for autosomal trisomy. Study Design: From January 1990 until July 1993 chorionic villus sampling was offered to all screened positive women. Results: Five hundred fifty-one mothers had chorionic villus sampling. The mean age was 31.7 years. The mean gestational age was 18.2 weeks. The mean time for direct karyotyping was 4.4 days and for culture results 20.2 days. Results were obtained in 99.6% of samples: direct plus culture results in 94%, direct results alone in 2.3%, and culture results alone in 3.3%. Fourteen pregnancies had abnormal karyotypes. There were five cases of placental mosaicism and one false-positive result. The loss rate was 0.4%. Conclusion: Midtrimester chorionic villus sampling, which is easier to perform than cordocentesis, provides a rapid and reliable karyotype. The complication rate is comparable to that of other invasive procedures.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/0002-9378(94)90029-9