Progesterone concentration and lambing rate of Karakul ewes treated with prostaglandin and GnRH combined with the ram effect during breeding and non-breeding seasons

The combination of ram effect with two injections of PGF2α 10-days apart and the same protocol plus an additional injection of GnRH prior to the first injection of PGF2α were examined in Karakul ewes during breeding and non-breeding seasons, respectively. Plasma progesterone (P4) concentrations (to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTheriogenology Vol. 100; pp. 120 - 125
Main Authors Mirzaei, A., Mohebbi-Fani, M., Omidi, A., Boostani, A., Nazifi, S., Mahmoodian-Fard, H.R., Chahardahcherik, M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 15.09.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The combination of ram effect with two injections of PGF2α 10-days apart and the same protocol plus an additional injection of GnRH prior to the first injection of PGF2α were examined in Karakul ewes during breeding and non-breeding seasons, respectively. Plasma progesterone (P4) concentrations (to detect the presence of active corpus luteum), twin lambing, litter size and synchronization of lambing were evaluated. In each study 70 ewes (2–4 years old) were divided to a treatment (n = 40) and a control (n = 30) group. During the breeding season, on days −10 and 0 before ram release, the treatment group was injected intramuscularly with PGF2α (D-Cloprostenol; 0.15 mg). During the non-breeding season, on day −15 before ram release the treatment group was injected with GnRH (buserelin; 4.2 μg) intramuscularly followed by two injections of PGF2α on days −10 and 0. In both studies, the rams were released into the ewe flock after the second prostaglandin injection (day 0). Blood samples of ewes were collected on days −10, 0, 20 and 70 of the study in breeding season and on days −15, −10, 0, 20 and 70 during non-breeding season. The treatment group had higher P4 concentrations compared to the control ewes on day 0 in the breeding season (5.80 ± 0.61 vs. 5.0 ± 0.93 ng/mL) and day −10 in the non-breeding season (3.50 ± 0.33 vs. 2.70 ± 0.35 ng/mL) though the differences were not significant (P > 0.05). Based on plasma P4 concentrations (>1 ng/mL) on day 70, in the breeding season all control ewes (100%) and 91.9% of the treatment ewes were detected to have active corpus luteum (P = 0.09). An almost inverse result (90% vs. 97.5%; P = 0.2) was detected in the non-breeding season. The lambing rate was higher (P = 0.03) in the treatment group compared to the control ewes during the non-breeding season (90% vs. 70%), but tended to be lower (P = 0.07) in the breeding season (73% vs. 90%). Twin lambing rate was higher in the treatment group compared to the control ewes in the breeding (40.7% vs. 0.0%; P < 0.05) and non-breeding (22.2% vs. 0.0%; P < 0.05) seasons. The litter size of the control and treated ewes were 1.0 ± 0.0 vs. 1.40 ± 0.10 in the breeding and 1.0 ± 0.0 vs. 1.22 ± 0.10 in the non-breeding season (P < 0.05). No effect was observed regard to synchronization of the treated ewes. In the breeding season two injections of PGF2α ten days apart combined with ram effect, may lower the lambing rate, but may enhance twin pregnancies and litter size in Karakul ewes. In the non-breeding season, however, the GnRH-PGF2α treatment plus ram effect may enhance the lambing rate, twin pregnancies and litter size.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0093-691X
1879-3231
DOI:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.06.005