Subject indexing in humanities: a comparison between a local university repository and an international bibliographic service

• Published in: Journal of documentation Vol. 76; no. 6; pp. 1193 - 1214
• Main Authors: Golub, Koraljka, Tyrkkö, Jukka, Hansson, Joacim, Ahlström, Ida
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bradford Emerald Publishing Limited 05.10.2020; Emerald Group Publishing Limited
• Subjects: Algorithms; Alliances; Bibliographic data bases; Bibliographic Databases; Bibliographies; Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap; Cataloging rules; Citation indexes; Classification; Classification schemes; Comparative Analysis; Digital humanities; Digital libraries; Discovery tools; Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records-FRBR; Humanities; Indexing; Information Needs; Information Services; Institutional repositories; Intellectual Disciplines; Interdisciplinary studies; International Organizations; Knowledge organization; Library and Information Science; Library associations; Library catalogs; Natural language; Objectives; Online Searching; Periodicals; Policies; R&D; Repositories; Research & development; Research and Development; Researchers; Resistance (Psychology); Search strategies; Semantics; Subject indexing; Humanities; Digital humanities; Institutional repositories; Knowledge organization; Bibliographic databases; Digital libraries; Subject indexing
• ISSN: 0022-0418; 1758-7379; 1758-7379
• DOI: 10.1108/JD-12-2019-0231

PurposeAs the humanities develop in the realm of increasingly more pronounced digital scholarship, it is important to provide quality subject access to a vast range of heterogeneous information objects in digital services. The study aims to paint a representative picture of the current state of affairs of the use of subject index terms in humanities journal articles with particular reference to the well-established subject access needs of humanities researchers, with the purpose of identifying which improvements are needed in this context.Design/methodology/approachThe comparison of subject metadata on a sample of 649 peer-reviewed journal articles from across the humanities is conducted in a university repository, against Scopus, the former reflecting local and national policies and the latter being the most comprehensive international abstract and citation database of research output.FindingsThe study shows that established bibliographic objectives to ensure subject access for humanities journal articles are not supported in either the world's largest commercial abstract and citation database Scopus or the local repository of a public university in Sweden. The indexing policies in the two services do not seem to address the needs of humanities scholars for highly granular subject index terms with appropriate facets; no controlled vocabularies for any humanities discipline are used whatsoever.Originality/valueIn all, not much has changed since 1990s when indexing for the humanities was shown to lag behind the sciences. The community of researchers and information professionals, today working together on digital humanities projects, as well as interdisciplinary research teams, should demand that their subject access needs be fulfilled, especially in commercial services like Scopus and discovery services.