Comparison of Different Techniques in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy Planning
This study aimed to minimize the radiation dose to organs other than the target tissue during adjuvant therapy applied for breast cancer, by using different planning methods. 30 women with T1-2 N1-3 M0 breast cancer were included in the study. Planning was performed using four different methods to t...
Saved in:
Published in | European journal of breast health Vol. 10; no. 2; pp. 83 - 87 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Turkey
Turkish Federation of Breast Diseases Associations
01.04.2014
Galenos Publishing House |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This study aimed to minimize the radiation dose to organs other than the target tissue during adjuvant therapy applied for breast cancer, by using different planning methods.
30 women with T1-2 N1-3 M0 breast cancer were included in the study. Planning was performed using four different methods to the supraclavicular area, internal, and external tangential fields. All planning was done in a virtual environment by and the requested data was obtained. All patients were treated by the 1st method. Method 1: Different isocenter, complete supraclavicular area, breast half beam. Method 2: Different isocenter, half supraclavicular area, breast half beam. Method 3: Single isocenter, half supraclavicular area, breast half beam. Method 4: Different isocenter, supraclavicular area full beam, breast full beam.
Evaluation of PTV values showed a statistically significant reduction in D-max, 110% and 115% values by method III. Lower doses in other parameters were not statistically significant.
Based on these results, the application of single isocenter, 3D radiotherapy in breast cancer provides significant advantages especially in PTV and pulmonary dosages. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1306-0945 1306-0953 2587-0831 |
DOI: | 10.5152/tjbh.2014.1772 |