Sedation with fentanyl and midazolam without oropharyngeal anesthesia compared with sedation with pethidine and midazolam with oropharyngeal anesthesia in ultrathin bronchoscopy for peripheral lung lesions

In advanced lung cancer, precision medicine requires repeated biopsies via bronchoscopy at therapy change. Since bronchoscopies are often stressful for patients, sedation using both fentanyl and midazolam is recommended in Europe and America. In Japan, bronchoscopies are generally orally performed u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRespiratory investigation Vol. 59; no. 2; pp. 228 - 234
Main Authors Sumi, Toshiyuki, Kamada, Koki, Sawai, Takeyuki, Shijubou, Naoki, Yamada, Yuichi, Nakata, Hisashi, Mori, Yuji, Chiba, Hirofumi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.03.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In advanced lung cancer, precision medicine requires repeated biopsies via bronchoscopy at therapy change. Since bronchoscopies are often stressful for patients, sedation using both fentanyl and midazolam is recommended in Europe and America. In Japan, bronchoscopies are generally orally performed under midazolam and oropharyngeal anesthesia. Nasal intubation creates a physiological route to the trachea, causing less irritation to the pharynx than intubation via the oral cavity; however, the necessity of oropharyngeal anesthesia remains unclear. We aimed to compare the safety, patient discomfort, and diagnostic rates for oropharyngeal anesthesia and sedation with pethidine and midazolam (Group A) and sedation with midazolam and fentanyl without oropharyngeal anesthesia (Group B) for ultrathin bronchoscopy of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) via nasal intubation. We retrospectively reviewed 74 consecutive potential lung cancer patients who underwent ultrathin bronchoscopies at the Hakodate Goryoukaku Hospital between July 2019 and June 2020. We reviewed the following: diagnostic rates; cumulative doses of lidocaine, midazolam, and fentanyl; hemodynamic changes; procedural complications in both groups. Pharyngeal anesthesia in group A was administered by spraying 2% (w/v) lidocaine into the pharynx. The chi-squared test was used for statistical analyses. There were no significant changes in hemodynamic parameters and complications. The mean level of discomfort for bronchoscopic examinations was significantly lower in Group B (2.39 vs. 1.64; P = 0.014), with no significant inter-group difference in the diagnostic yields for PPLs (63.0% vs. 71.4%; P = 0.46). Our findings indicate the advantages of sedation with fentanyl and midazolam without oropharyngeal anesthesia for ultrathin bronchoscopy through nasal intubation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2212-5345
2212-5353
DOI:10.1016/j.resinv.2020.10.001