Evaluation of a reverse hybridization assay for genotyping of hepatitis C virus
Background/Aims: Several strains of the hepatitis C virus exist; distinct genotypes and subtypes can be identified by sequence comparison of the viral genomes. Recent evidence that the genotype/subtype of hepatitis C virus may infuence the clinical course of chronic hepatitis C and the response to i...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of hepatology Vol. 23; no. 6; pp. 654 - 661 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Elsevier B.V
01.12.1995
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background/Aims: Several strains of the hepatitis C virus exist; distinct genotypes and subtypes can be identified by sequence comparison of the viral genomes. Recent evidence that the genotype/subtype of hepatitis C virus may infuence the clinical course of chronic hepatitis C and the response to interferon-
a therapy for this disease suggests that methods to identify the genotype may become clinically useful. In the present study we evaluated a recently introduced reverse hybridization assay.
Methods: HCV-RNA was isolated from serum samples from 61 consecutive patients attending our out-patient clinic and subsequently sequenced in the 5′-noncoding and the nonstructural-5 region by the dideoxynucleotide chain termination method. HCV-genotyping was performed by phylogenetic analysis of nonstructural-5 sequences. The amplification product for the reverse hybridization assay was obtained by “nested” polymerase chain reaction using biotinylated primers corresponding to the 5′-noncoding region. The assay is based on hybridization of the resulting polymerase chain reaction product with oligonucleotide probes immobilized as paralleled lines on membrane strips.
Results: According to the phylogenetic analysis of the nonstructural-5 region the prevalence of hepatitis C virus subtypes was as follows: 1a 18%. 1b 51%, 2a 3%, 2b 3%, 2c 7% and 3a 18%. The reverse hybridization assay correctly identified each hepatitis C virus genotype (1, 2, and 3). However, differentiation of hepatitis C virus subtypes was insufficient.
1
11
HCV-1a isolates was incorrectly classified by the reverse hybridization assay as HCV-1b and
vice versa
3
31
HCV-1b isolates as HCV-1a. Classification of hepatitis C virus subtypes 2a, 2b and 3a was correct, but
4
4
HCV-2c isolates were misinterpreted by the assay a HCV-2a.
Conclusions: The reverse hybridization assay can differentiate between hepatitis C virus genotypes 1, 2, and 3, but is not completely reliable for hepatitis C virus subtyping. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0168-8278 1600-0641 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0168-8278(95)80030-1 |