Heart rate variability during carbachol-induced REM sleep and cataplexy

•REM sleep (REMc) and cataplexy (CA) were induced by carbachol injections into the NPO.•HRV was evaluated during these conditions and natural sleep and wakefulness.•Heart rate was greater during CA while LF power was larger during natural REM sleep.•In CA there was a decrease in coupling between the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBehavioural brain research Vol. 291; pp. 72 - 79
Main Authors Torterolo, Pablo, Castro-Zaballa, Santiago, Cavelli, Matías, Velasquez, Noelia, Brando, Victoria, Falconi, Atilio, Chase, Michael H., Migliaro, Eduardo R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 15.09.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•REM sleep (REMc) and cataplexy (CA) were induced by carbachol injections into the NPO.•HRV was evaluated during these conditions and natural sleep and wakefulness.•Heart rate was greater during CA while LF power was larger during natural REM sleep.•In CA there was a decrease in coupling between the tachogram and respiratory activity.•Although the somatomotor atonia was the same, REMc and CA have differences in the HRV. The nucleus pontis oralis (NPO) exerts an executive control over REM sleep. Cholinergic input to the NPO is critical for REM sleep generation. In the cat, a single microinjection of carbachol (a cholinergic agonist) into the NPO produces either REM sleep (REMc) or wakefulness with muscle atonia (cataplexy, CA). In order to study the central control of the heart rate variability (HRV) during sleep, we conducted polysomnographic and electrocardiogram recordings from chronically prepared cats during REMc, CA as well as during sleep and wakefulness. Subsequently, we performed statistical and spectral analyses of the HRV. The heart rate was greater during CA compared to REMc, NREM or REM sleep. Spectral analysis revealed that the low frequency band (LF) power was significantly higher during REM sleep in comparison to REMc and CA. Furthermore, we found that during CA there was a decrease in coupling between the RR intervals plot (tachogram) and respiratory activity. In contrast, compared to natural behavioral states, during REMc and CA there were no significant differences in the HRV based upon the standard deviation of normal RR intervals (SDNN) and the mean squared difference of successive intervals (rMSSD). In conclusion, there were differences in the HRV during naturally-occurring REM sleep compared to REMc. In addition, in spite of the same muscle atonia, the HRV was different during REMc and CA. Therefore, the neuronal network that controls the HRV during REM sleep can be dissociated from the one that generates the muscle atonia during this state.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0166-4328
1872-7549
DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2015.05.015