Conservative surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy in the management of adult soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities: Clinical and radiobiological results

• Published in: International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics Vol. 32; no. 4; pp. 977 - 985
• Main Authors: Mundt, Arno J., Awan, Azhar, Sibley, Gregory S., Simon, Michael, Rubin, Steven J., Samuels, Brian, Wong, William, Beckett, Michael, Vijayakumar, S., Weichselbaum, Ralph R.
• Format: Journal Article Conference Proceeding
• Language: English
• Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 15.07.1995; Elsevier
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amputation; Biological and medical sciences; Conservative surgery; Disease-Free Survival; Diseases of the osteoarticular system; Dose; Extremities; Female; Humans; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Radiobiology; Radiotherapy; Radiotherapy - adverse effects; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant; Retrospective Studies; Sarcoma - mortality; Sarcoma - radiotherapy; Sarcoma - surgery; Soft tissue sarcoma; Treatment Failure; Treatment volume; Tumors of striated muscle and skeleton; Soft tissue sarcoma; Treatment volume; Conservative surgery; Radiobiology; Radiotherapy; Dose; Human; Biochemical analysis; Sarcoma; Treatment efficiency; Diseases of the osteoarticular system; Adjuvant treatment; Lower limb; Radiologic investigation; Malignant tumor; Adult; Upper limb; Clinical investigation; End; Soft tissue
• ISSN: 0360-3016; 1879-355X
• DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00111-B

The outcome of adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities treated with conservative surgery and adjuvant irradiation was evaluated to (a) determine the appropriate treatment volume and radiation dosage in the postoperative setting, and (b) correlate in vitro radiobiological parameters obtained prior to therapy with clinical outcome. Sixty-four consecutive adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities (40 lower, 24 upper) who underwent conservative surgery and adjuvant irradiation 7 preoperative, 50 postoperative, 7 perioperative) between 1978 and 1991 were reviewed. The initial radiation field margin surrounding the tumor bed/scar was retrospectively analyzed in all postoperative patients. Initial field margins were < 5 cm in 12 patients, 5-9.9 cm in 32 and > or = 10 cm in 6. Patients with negative pathological margins were initially treated with traditional postoperative doses (64-66 Gy); however, in later years the postoperative dose was reduced to 60 Gy. Thirteen cell lines were established prior to definite therapy, and radiobiological parameters (multitarget and linear-quadratic) were obtained and correlated with outcome. Postoperative patients treated with an initial field margin of < 5 cm had a 5-year local control of 30.4% vs. 93.2% in patients treated with an initial margin of > or = 5 cm (p = 0.0003). Five-year local control rates were similar in patients treated with initial field margins of 5-9.9 cm (91.6%) compared with those treated with > or = 10 cm margins (100%) (p = 0.49). While postoperative patients receiving < 60 Gy had a worse local control than those receiving > or = 60 Gy (p = 0.08), no difference was seen in local control between patients receiving less than traditional postoperative doses (60-63.9 Gy) (74.4% vs. those receiving 64-66 Gy (87.0%) (p = 0.5). The local control of patients treated in the later years of the study, with strict attention to surgical and radiotherapeutic technique, was 87.6%. Severe late sequelae were more frequent in patients treated with doses > or = 63 Gy compared to patients treated with lower doses (23.1% vs. 0%) (p < 0.05). Mean values for Do, alpha, beta, D, n and SF2 obtained from the 13 cell lines were 115.7, 0.66, 0.029, 2.15, 0.262, respectively. Four of the 13 cell lines established prior to therapy ultimately failed locally. The radiobiological parameters of these cell lines were similar to the other nine cell lines in terms of radiosensitivity. Our data confirm the importance of maintaining an initial field margin of at least 5 cm around the tumor bed/scar in the postoperative setting. No benefit was seen with the use of margins > or = 10 cm. In addition, patients undergoing wide local excision with negative margins can be treated with lower than traditional postoperative doses (60 Gy) without compromising local control and with fewer chronic sequelae. Finally, it does not appear that inherent tumor cell sensitivity is a major determinant of local failure following radiation therapy and conservative surgery in soft tissue sarcoma.