Sofosbuvir-based Regimens with Task Shifting Is Cost-effective in Expanding Hepatitis C Treatment Access in the United States

The current paradigm of specialist physician-managed treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) is inefficient in absorbing the approximately 3 million patients awaiting treatment in the United States. Task shifting-whereby specialist physicians screen patients for treatment eligibility...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical and translational hepatology Vol. 5; no. 1; pp. 16 - 22
Main Authors Jayasekera, Channa R, Beckerman, Rachel, Smith, Nathaniel, Perumpail, Ryan B, Wong, Robert J, Younossi, Zobair M, Ahmed, Aijaz
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Center for Innovation in Global Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA%Maple Health Group, LLC, New York, New York, USA%Liver Transplant Program, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA%Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Alameda Health System, Highland Hospital, Oakland, California, USA%Department of Medicine, Center for Liver Diseases, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia, USA 28.03.2017
Liver Transplant Program, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
Betty and Guy Beatty Center for Integrated Research, Inova Health System, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
XIA & HE Publishing Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The current paradigm of specialist physician-managed treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) is inefficient in absorbing the approximately 3 million patients awaiting treatment in the United States. Task shifting-whereby specialist physicians screen patients for treatment eligibility but on-treatment monitoring is devolved to more abundant non-physician clinicians-achieves non-inferior treatment outcomes with second generation direct-acting antivirals (2 Gen DAAs), may increase treatment capacity, and may facilitate greater treatment access. We determined the cost effectiveness of 2 Gen DAAs with respect to interferon-based first-generation DAAs (1 Gen DAAs) within a task-shifted treatment model. Using a previously described decision-analytic Markov structure, we modeled a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients with HCV genotype 1 infection over a lifetime horizon, based upon our outreach clinic's HCV treatment protocol. Treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced HCV cohorts were modeled separately, based upon our outr8each clinic's demographics. Treatment response to 2 Gen DAAs was modeled based on our outreach clinic's data. Adverse events, utility, costing, and transition probabilities were sourced from the literature. Driven by improved effectiveness and safety, as well as an expected increase in treatment capacity, 2 Gen DAAs treatment monitored by non-physician clinicians was projected to improve health outcomes and be dominant from a cost-effective perspective versus that of 1 Gen DAAs. Trends were consistent across all assessed patient subpopulations. Based on an assumption of increased treatment capacity accompanying a task-shifted treatment model, 2 Gen DAAs-based treatment was cost effective and cost saving as compared to 1 Gen DAAs-based treatment for all HCV patient subgroups assessed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Conceived the study (AA, CRJ), obtained the funding (RB, AA, CRJ), acquired the data (AA, CRJ), developed the models (RB, NS), interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript (CRJ, RB, AA), critically reviewed the data and contributed to writing of the manuscript (RBP, RJW, ZMY).
Dr. Beckerman and Smith are consultant to Gilead, Dr. Wong is advisory board membership of Gilead and received research grants from Gilead, Dr. Younossi is consultant of AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Glaxo Smith Kline, and Intercept, Dr. Ahmed is advisory board membership of AbbVie, Gilead, Intercept, Janssen, and Shire, and received research grants from Gilead and Intercept. The others have no conflict of interest to declare.
ISSN:2225-0719
2310-8819
DOI:10.14218/JCTH.2016.00052