Impact of fine‐scale edaphic heterogeneity on tree species assembly in a central African rainforest

• Published in: Journal of vegetation science Vol. 26; no. 1; pp. 134 - 144
• Main Authors: Vleminckx, Jason, Drouet, Thomas, Amani, Christian, Lisingo, Janvier, Lejoly, Jean, Hardy, Olivier J, De Cáceres, Miquel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Opulus Press 2015; Blackwell Publishing Ltd
• Subjects: biodiversity; biogeography; Canopy; clay soils; Edaphic heterogeneity; Floristic variability; forest reserves; forest trees; Habitat differentiation; Habitat preference; habitat preferences; habitats; rain forests; sandy soils; seed dispersal; soil properties; soil sampling; Subcanopy; testing; Torus-translation; tropical forests; Democratic Republic of the Congo; Africa
• ISSN: 1100-9233; 1654-1103
• DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12209

QUESTIONS: Soil properties have been shown to partially explain tree species distribution in tropical forests. Locally, species turnover across space can result not only from edaphic heterogeneities but also from limited seed dispersal. To characterize the contribution of each process, contact areas between contrasted soil types offer ideal settings. In the present study, we aimed to test species and species assemblage responses to a sharp edaphic discontinuity in a tropical forest tree community. LOCATION: Yoko forest reserve (6975 ha), Democratic Republic of the Congo. METHODS: We set up four 500–600‐m long parallel transects crossing two contrasted edaphic habitats, one lying on clayey soil and the other on sandy soil. The canopy and subcanopy trees were identified and geo‐referenced along the transects over a width of 50 m and 5 m, respectively, and soil samples were collected every 50 m to characterize each habitat. RESULTS: Correspondence analyses indicated a clear differentiation of tree communities between sandy and clayey soils. Using a torus‐translation method combined with Chi‐squared non‐parametric tests, we observed that ca. 40% and 18% of the species represented by at least 12 individuals displayed significant density differences according to habitat in the canopy and subcanopy, respectively, although very few species displayed significant differences in their relative abundance. Nevertheless, whole community tests of differentiation (in species relative abundances) between soil types were significant in both strata, even after removing individual species or families displaying a significant habitat preference. CONCLUSION: While only a minority of species displayed a clear habitat preference, we still observed a community‐wide impact of the edaphic discontinuity on species assemblages at a local scale. Our results provide further evidence for the major contribution of environmental heterogeneity in maintaining biodiversity in tropical forests.