Perceived Similarity, Expectation-Reality Discrepancies, and Mentors' Expressed Intention to Remain in Big Brothers/Big Sisters Programs

Studies have begun to document the academic and psychosocial benefits of Big Brothers/ Big Sisters programs for at‐risk youth (Rhodes, Grossman, & Resch, 2000). However, investigators have noted a problem with mentor attrition (Meissen & Lounsbury, 1981). The purpose of the current study was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of applied social psychology Vol. 34; no. 3; pp. 598 - 623
Main Authors Madia, Benjamin P., Lutz, Catherine J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2004
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Studies have begun to document the academic and psychosocial benefits of Big Brothers/ Big Sisters programs for at‐risk youth (Rhodes, Grossman, & Resch, 2000). However, investigators have noted a problem with mentor attrition (Meissen & Lounsbury, 1981). The purpose of the current study was twofold. First, we explored the relative importance of specific dimensions of perceived similarity (including similarity in attitudes, interests, race, and personality) as well as mentors' expectation‐reality discrepancies in predicting mentors' expressed intention to remain in Big Brothers/Big Sisters programs. Second, we examined a model whereby interpersonal attraction and relationship quality served as mediators of these associations. Our results suggest that perceived similarity in extraver‐sion as well as the discrepancy between mentors' ideal versus actual roles were significant predictors of mentors' expressed intention to remain in the relationship. Relationship quality and interpersonal attraction appeared to mediate these findings.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JASP598
ark:/67375/WNG-DP4TRNZ9-6
istex:76116190493F7BA67C7687F44069BAAD263A3FC2
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0021-9029
1559-1816
DOI:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02562.x