Strong habitat and weak genetic effects shape the lifetime reproductive success in a wild clownfish population
The relative contributions of environmental, maternal and additive genetic factors to the Lifetime reproductive success (LRS) determine whether species can adapt to rapid environmental change. Yet to date, studies quantifying LRS across multiple generations in marine species in the wild are non‐exis...
Saved in:
Published in | Ecology letters Vol. 23; no. 2; pp. 265 - 273 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.02.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The relative contributions of environmental, maternal and additive genetic factors to the Lifetime reproductive success (LRS) determine whether species can adapt to rapid environmental change. Yet to date, studies quantifying LRS across multiple generations in marine species in the wild are non‐existent. Here we used 10‐year pedigrees resolved for a wild orange clownfish population from Kimbe Island (PNG) and a quantitative genetic linear mixed model approach to quantify the additive genetic, maternal and environmental contributions to variation in LRS for the self‐recruiting portion of the population. We found that the habitat of the breeder, including the anemone species and geographic location, made the greatest contribution to LRS. There were low to negligible contributions of genetic and maternal factors equating with low heritability and evolvability. Our findings imply that our population will be susceptible to short‐term, small‐scale changes in habitat structure and may have limited capacity to adapt to these changes.
In the wild orange clownfish population from Kimbe Island (PNG), a 10 years survey combined to quantitative genetic analyses revealed that the habitat of the breeder, including the anemone species and geographic location, made the greatest contribution to the reproductive success for the self‐recruiting portion of the population. There were low to negligible contributions of genetic and maternal factors equating with low heritability and evolvability, which implies that our population will be susceptible to short‐term, small‐scale changes in habitat structure and may have limited capacity to adapt to these changes. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Correspondence-1 |
ISSN: | 1461-023X 1461-0248 1461-0248 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ele.13428 |