Regorafenib Efficacy After Sorafenib in Patients With Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Study
Safety of regorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) has been recently demonstrated. We aimed to assess the survival benefit of regorafenib compared with best supportive care (BSC) in LT patients after sorafenib discontinuation. This observational multi...
Saved in:
Published in | Liver transplantation Vol. 27; no. 12; pp. 1767 - 1778 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.12.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Safety of regorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) has been recently demonstrated. We aimed to assess the survival benefit of regorafenib compared with best supportive care (BSC) in LT patients after sorafenib discontinuation. This observational multicenter retrospective study included LT patients with HCC recurrence who discontinued first‐line sorafenib. Group 1 comprised regorafenib‐treated patients, whereas the control group was selected among patients treated with BSC due to unavailability of second‐line options at the time of sorafenib discontinuation and who were sorafenib‐tolerant progressors (group 2). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) of group 1 compared with group 2. Secondary endpoints were safety and OS of sequential treatment with sorafenib + regorafenib/BSC. Among 132 LT patients who discontinued sorafenib included in the study, 81 were sorafenib tolerant: 36 received regorafenib (group 1) and 45 (group 2) received BSC. Overall, 24 (67%) patients died in group 1 and 40 (89%) in group 2: the median OS was significantly longer in group 1 than in group 2 (13.1 versus 5.5 months; P < 0.01). Regorafenib treatment was an independent predictor of reduced mortality (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16‐0.89; P = 0.02). Median treatment duration with regorafenib was 7.0 (95% CI, 5.5‐8.5) months; regorafenib dose was reduced in 22 (61%) patients for adverse events and discontinued for tumor progression in 93% (n = 28). The median OS calculated from sorafenib start was 28.8 months (95% CI, 17.6‐40.1) in group 1 versus 15.3 months (95% CI, 8.8‐21.7) in group 2 (P < 0.01). Regorafenib is an effective second‐line treatment after sorafenib in patients with HCC recurrence after LT. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Massimo Iavarone and Pietro Lampertico received grants from Italian Health Ministry (“Ricerca Corrente RC2017/105‐01,” “Ricerca Corrente RC2018/105‐01,” and “Ricerca Corrente RC2019/105‐01”); Marco Sanduzzi‐Zamparelli was supported by “Ajuts per a la iniciació a la recerca 2019 from Societat Catalana de Digestologia (SCD)” and received grant support from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (FI19/041958); Álvaro Díaz‐González was supported by the following grants: ISCIII (CM15/00050), Societat Catalana de Digestologia Ajuts per a la iniciació a la recerca 2017, and Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer Ayuda Clínico Junior 2018 (CLJUN18016DIAZ); Maria Reig received grant support from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI15/00145 and PI18/0358); Jordi Bruix received grant support from the Spanish Health Ministry (Plan Estratégico Nacional contra la Hepatitis C) and is also supported by CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya. Álvaro Díaz‐González is on the speakers’ bureau for and received grants from Bayer, Intercept, and Gilead. Jordi Bruix consults for, is on the speakers’ bureau for, and received grants from Bayer and BTG; he consults for and is on the speakers’ bureau for Ipsen, Eisai, Terumo, and Sirtex, and consults for ArQule, Novartis, BMS, Kowa, Gilead, Bio‐Alliance, Roche, AbbVie, MSD, Astra‐medimmune, Incyte, Quirem, Adaptimmune, Lilly, Basilea, Nerviano, and Sanofi. Maria Reig consults for, advises, is on the speakers’ bureau for, and received grants from Bayer, Ipsen, BMS, Roche, Lilly, BTG, and AstraZeneca. She is on the speakers’ bureau for Gilead and Eisai. Gonzalo Sapisochin consults for, advises, and received grants from Roche; he consults for and advises Integra and AstraZeneca; consults for Novartis; and received grants from Bayer. Federico Piñero consults for, advises, and is on the speakers’ bureau for Bayer; is on the speakers’ bureau and received grants from Roche; and is on the speakers’ bureau for LKM. Giovanni Di Costanzo is on the speakers’ bureau for AstraZeneca and MSD. Pietro Lampertico advises and is on the speakers’ bureau for Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, AbbVie, Arrowhead, Alnylam, Eiger, MYR Pharma, and Janssen. Marco Sanduzzi‐Zamparelli is on the speakers’ bureau and received grants from Bayer and has also received grants from BTG and MSD. Marcus‐Alexander Wörns advises, is on the speakers’ bureau, and received grants from Bayer. Maria Francesca Donato is on the speakers’ bureau and received grants from Kedrion. Maria Varela consults for, advises, is on the speakers’ bureau, and received grants from Bayer. She advises and is on the speakers’ bureau for Eisai, Roche, and AstraZeneca and advises Boston Scientific. Massimo Iavarone consults for Bayer, Ipsen, and MSD and is on the speakers’ bureau for Gilead, Roche, and Eisai. Matthias Pinter consults for and received grants from Bayer and BMS and consults for Eisai, MSD, Lilly, and Roche. Helene Regnault consults for Boston Scientific. Sherrie Bhoori advises and is on the speakers’ bureau for Eisai; she is on the speakers’ bureau for Biotest and Boston Scientific. |
ISSN: | 1527-6465 1527-6473 1527-6473 |
DOI: | 10.1002/lt.26264 |