Hand-assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy

• Published in: British journal of surgery Vol. 91; no. 3; pp. 344 - 348
• Main Authors: Maartense, S., Idu, M., Bemelman, F. J., Balm, R., Surachno, S., Bemelman, W. A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.03.2004; Wiley
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Biological and medical sciences; Blood Loss, Surgical; Feasibility Studies; General aspects; Graft Rejection - etiology; Graft Survival; Humans; Ischemia - etiology; Kidney Transplantation - methods; Laparoscopy - methods; Living Donors; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Nephrectomy - mortality; Postoperative Complications - etiology; Prospective Studies; Medicine; Treatment; Nephrectomy; Surgery; Living donor; Laparoscopy; Endoscopy; Hand
• ISSN: 0007-1323; 1365-2168
• DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4432

Background: Hand‐assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HLDN) may have advantages over laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, such as shorter learning curve, operation and warm ischaemia times. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of HLDN. Methods: Between January 2000 and October 2002, 50 consecutive HLDN procedures were performed through a low transverse abdominal incision, 23 right sided and 27 left sided. Results: The median age of the donors was 44 years. No HLDN required conversion to an open procedure. The median operating time for HLDN was 153 min. The median warm ischaemia time was 3 (range 1·0–4·5) min and the median blood loss was 50 (range 20–500) ml in both left‐ and right‐sided procedures. Eight patients suffered ten minor complications during their admission. The duration of hospital stay was 5 days for donors. Three recipients developed graft failure owing to acute rejection, renal vein thrombosis and ischaemic necrosis. Conclusion: Both left‐ and right‐sided HLDN procedures were feasible and safe through a low transverse abdominal incision. Copyright © 2004 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. A compromise between laparoscopic and open methods