Memory in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: Reprogrammed Human Retinal‐Pigmented Epithelial Cells Show Tendency for Spontaneous Redifferentiation
Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells have been generated from a variety of somatic cell types via introduction of transcription factors that mediate pluripotency. However, it is unknown that all cell types can be reprogrammed and whether the origin of the parental cell ultimately determines the beha...
Saved in:
Published in | Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) Vol. 28; no. 11; pp. 1981 - 1991 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
01.11.2010
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells have been generated from a variety of somatic cell types via introduction of transcription factors that mediate pluripotency. However, it is unknown that all cell types can be reprogrammed and whether the origin of the parental cell ultimately determines the behavior of the resultant iPS cell line. We sought to determine whether human retinal‐pigmented epithelial (RPE) cells could be reprogrammed, and to test the hypothesis that reprogrammed cells retain a “memory” of their origin in terms of propensity for differentiation. We reprogrammed primary fetal RPE cells via lentiviral expression of OCT4, SOX2, LIN28, and Nanog. The iPS cell lines derived from RPE exhibited morphologies similar to human embryonic stem cells and other iPS cell lines, expressed stem cell markers, and formed teratomas‐containing derivatives of all three germ layers. To test whether these iPS cells retained epigenetic imprints from the parental RPE cells, we analyzed their propensity for spontaneous differentiation back into RPE after removal of FGF2. We found that some, but not all, iPS lines exhibited a marked preference for redifferentiation into RPE. Our results show that RPE cells can be reprogrammed to pluripotency, and suggest that they often retain a memory of their previous state of differentiation. STEM CELLS 2010;28:1981–1991 |
---|---|
Bibliography: | First published online in STEM CELLS September 29, 2010. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article. Author contributions: Q.H.: conception and design, collection and assembly of data, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing, final approval of manuscript; A.M.F.: collection of data; L.V.J.: conception and design, financial support, manuscript writing, final approval of manuscript; D.O.C.: conception and design, financial support, manuscript writing, final approval of manuscript. EXPRESS Telephone: 805‐893‐8490; Fax: 805‐893‐2005 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1066-5099 1549-4918 |
DOI: | 10.1002/stem.531 |