Divide-and-conquer checkpointing for arbitrary programs with no user annotation

• Published in: Optimization methods & software Vol. 33; no. 4-6; pp. 1288 - 1330
• Main Authors: Siskind, Jeffrey Mark, Pearlmutter, Barak A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Abingdon Taylor & Francis 02.11.2018; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: Annotations; Automation; binomial checkpointing; Checkpointing; compiler theory; Computation; Innovations; Intervals; lambda calculus; programming language theory; Reverse-mode automatic differentiation; treeverse
• ISSN: 1055-6788; 1029-4937
• DOI: 10.1080/10556788.2018.1459621

Classical reverse-mode automatic differentiation (AD) imposes only a small constant-factor overhead in operation count over the original computation, but has storage requirements that grow, in the worst case, in proportion to the time consumed by the original computation. This storage blowup can be ameliorated by checkpointing, a process that reorders application of classical reverse-mode AD over an execution interval to tradeoff space vs. time. Application of checkpointing in a divide-and-conquer fashion to strategically chosen nested execution intervals can break classical reverse-mode AD into stages which can reduce the worst-case growth in storage from linear to sublinear. Doing this has been fully automated only for computations of particularly simple form, with checkpoints spanning execution intervals resulting from a limited set of program constructs. Here we show how the technique can be automated for arbitrary computations. The essential innovation is to apply the technique at the level of the language implementation itself, thus allowing checkpoints to span any execution interval.