Assessing the potential of ultraviolet irradiation for inactivating waterborne fungal spores: kinetics and photoreactivation studies
Ultraviolet disinfection has been extensively studied in recent years, especially in bacteria; however, there are still insufficient studies in fungal spores. Moreover, most studies use static batch reactors instead of continuous flow reactors, which are used mainly at the industrial scale. In the p...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in environmental science Vol. 11 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Lausanne
Frontiers Research Foundation
28.07.2023
Frontiers Media S.A |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Ultraviolet disinfection has been extensively studied in recent years, especially in bacteria; however, there are still insufficient studies in fungal spores. Moreover, most studies use static batch reactors instead of continuous flow reactors, which are used mainly at the industrial scale. In the present work, the inactivation and reactivation characteristics of two species of filamentous fungi were studied using a single-pass flow-through UV-C reactor (FTR). For this purpose,
Aspergillus niger
and
Penicillium
sp. spores were suspended in water and circulated through the reactor at different UV-C doses. The effects on inactivation and reactivation after 24 in either light or dark conditions were studied. The two fungal strains studied show different UV-C treatment resistance and damage repair capacity. With the experimented FTR system, an inactivation efficiency of up to 2 log units (99% removal) was achieved with doses of 220.1 ± 24.3
m
J
c
m
−
2
in the case of
Aspergillus niger
and 123.8 ± 6.3
m
J
c
m
−
2
in the case of
Penicillium
sp. The effect of dark repair is negligible, while the photoreactivation process is relevant in the case of
Penicillium
sp., since D
2
increased by 53.8% just after UV-C exposure due to photoreactivation. In general,
A. niger
is more UV-C resistant than
Penicillium
sp.; however, the latter has a greater capacity to photoreactivate. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2296-665X 2296-665X |
DOI: | 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1212807 |