Effect of Different Levels of Pressure Support and Proportional Assist Ventilation on Breathing Pattern, Work of Breathing and Gas Exchange in Mechanically Ventilated Hypercapnic COPD Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure

Background: Proportional assist ventilation (PAV) has been shown to maintain better patient-ventilator synchrony than pressure support ventilation (PSV); however, its clinical advantage regarding invasive ventilation of COPD patients has not been clarified. Objectives: To compare the effect of PAV a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRespiration Vol. 70; no. 4; pp. 355 - 361
Main Authors Passam, F., Hoing, S., Prinianakis, G., Siafakas, N., Milic-Emili, J., Georgopoulos, D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel, Switzerland Karger 01.07.2003
S. Karger AG
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Proportional assist ventilation (PAV) has been shown to maintain better patient-ventilator synchrony than pressure support ventilation (PSV); however, its clinical advantage regarding invasive ventilation of COPD patients has not been clarified. Objectives: To compare the effect of PAV and PSV on respiratory parameters of hypercapnic COPD patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). Methods: Nine intubated hypercapnic COPD patients were placed on the PAV or PSV mode in random sequence. For each mode, four levels (L 1 –L 4 ) of support were applied. At each level, blood gases, flow, tidal volume (V T ), airway pressure (Paw), esophageal pressure (Pes) (n = 7), patient respiratory rate (fp), ventilator rate (fv), missing efforts (ME = fp – fv) were measured. Results: We found increases in ME with increasing levels of PSV but not with PAV. PO 2 and V T increased whereas PCO 2 decreased significantly with increasing levels of PSV (p < 0.05). With PAV, PCO 2 decreased and V T increased significantly only at L 4 whereas PO 2 increased from L 1 to L 4 . Runaways were observed at L 3 and L 4 of PAV. The pressure-time product (PTP) was determined for effective and missing breaths. The mean total PTP per minute (of effective plus missing breaths) was 160 ± 57 cm H 2 O/s·min in PSV and 194 ± 60 cm H 2 O/s·min in PAV. Conclusion: We conclude that in COPD patients with hypercapnic ARF, with increasing support, PSV causes the appearance of ME whereas PAV develops runaway phenomena, due to the different patient-ventilator interaction; however, these do not limit the improvement of blood gases with the application of both methods.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0025-7931
1423-0356
DOI:10.1159/000072897